Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25589911›Full record

ArticleApplied clinical informatics2014

Design challenges for electronic medication administration record systems in residential aged care facilities: a formative evaluation.

A Tariq, E Lehnbom, K Oliver, A Georgiou, C Rowe, T Osmond, J Westbrook

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied clinical informatics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Nursing Information Flow in Long-Term Care Facilities.Applied clinical informatics · 2018
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

A TariqCentre of Health Systems and Safety Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University , New South Wales, Australia.
E LehnbomCentre of Health Systems and Safety Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University , New South Wales, Australia.
K OliverCentre of Health Systems and Safety Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University , New South Wales, Australia.
A GeorgiouCentre of Health Systems and Safety Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University , New South Wales, Australia.
C RoweUnitingCare Ageing , Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
T OsmondUnitingCare Ageing , Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
J WestbrookCentre of Health Systems and Safety Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University , New South Wales, Australia.
Macquarie University · AUDepartment of Health and Aged Care · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionElectronic medication administration record (eMAR) systems are promoted as a potential intervention to enhance medication safety in residential aged care facilities (RACFs). The purpose of this study was to conduct an in-practice evaluation of an eMAR being piloted in one Australian RACF before its roll out, and to provide recommendations for system improvements.

methodsA multidisciplinary team conducted direct observations of workflow (n=34 hours) in the RACF site and the community pharmacy. Semi-structured interviews (n=5) with RACF staff and the community pharmacist were conducted to investigate their views of the eMAR system. Data were analysed using a grounded theory approach to identify challenges associated with the design of the eMAR system.

resultsThe current eMAR system does not offer an end-to-end solution for medication management. Many steps, including prescribing by doctors and communication with the community pharmacist, are still performed manually using paper charts and fax machines. Five major challenges associated with the design of eMAR system were identified: limited interactivity; inadequate flexibility; problems related to information layout and semantics; the lack of relevant decision support; and system maintenance issues. We suggest recommendations to improve the design of the eMAR system and to optimize existing workflows. DISCUSSION: Immediate value can be achieved by improving the system interactivity, reducing inconsistencies in data entry design and offering dedicated organisational support to minimise connectivity issues. Longer-term benefits can be achieved by adding decision support features and establishing system interoperability requirements with stakeholder groups (e.g. community pharmacies) prior to system roll out. In-practice evaluations of technologies like eMAR system have great value in identifying design weaknesses which inhibit optimal system use.

Indexed as

Clinical Pharmacy Information SystemsElectronic Health RecordsDecision Support Systems, ClinicalHumansResidential FacilitiesSemanticselectronic medication administration recordsformative evaluationMedication administrationresidential aged care facilitiessystem design

Identifiers

PMID25589911
PMCPMC4287675
OpenAlexW2316763417

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.