Trial reportJournal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN2015
Diagnosis and Prediction of CKD Progression by Assessment of Urinary Peptides.
Trial report in Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 118 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
118 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Recent Advances in Urinary Peptide and Proteomic Biomarkers in Chronic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Pooled it
- [Early detection by urinary proteome analysis : A new concept in patient management of diabetic nephropathy].Der Internist · 2020Pooled it
- Urine Fibrosis Markers and Risk of Allograft Failure in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Case-Cohort Ancillary Study of the FAVORIT Trial.American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation · 2017Trial
- A capillary electrophoresis coupled to mass spectrometry pipeline for long term comparable assessment of the urinary metabolome.Scientific reports · 2016Trial
- Integrative analysis of circ_DLGAP4, lncRNA KCNQ1OT1, and the miR-9/SOX7 interaction network in chronic kidney disease progression: a case-control study.Functional & integrative genomics · 2026Observational
- Urinary Collagen Peptides Predict Mortality.Proteomics · 2026Article
- Non-diabetic Kidney Disease in Type 2 Diabetes: From Kidney Biopsy to Precision Medicine.Cureus · 2026Review
- Urine as a source of biomarkers and biological knowledge in chronic kidney disease.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2026Review
- Reduced collagen degradation in pelvic urine precedes kidney fibrosis induced by unilateral ureteral obstruction.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Development and Validation of a Capillary Electrophoresis Coupled to Mass Spectrometry Pipeline for Comparable Assessment of the Plasma Peptidome.Proteomics · 2025Article
- Association of Urinary Collagen Type III Degradation Product With Kidney Function and Fibrosis in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients.Proteomics · 2025Article
- Urinary peptide signature distinguishes autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease from other causes of chronic kidney disease.Clinical kidney journal · 2025Article
- Nomenclature of renal involvement in diabetes mellitus: unify to manage diversity.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- Urinary Proteomic Shifts over Time and Their Associations with eGFR Decline in Chronic Kidney Disease.Biomolecules · 2025Article
- Identification of progression-related genes and construction of prognostic model for chronic kidney disease by machine learning.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Article
- Review
- Protein Biomarkers of Ultra-Processed Food Consumption and Risk of Coronary Heart Disease, Chronic Kidney Disease, and All-Cause Mortality.The Journal of nutrition · 2024Article
- Exploring Adiposity and Chronic Kidney Disease: Clinical Implications, Management Strategies, Prognostic Considerations.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Review
- Biomarkers of Kidney Disease Progression in ADPKD.Kidney international reports · 2024Review
- Article
58 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
34 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Progressive CKD is generally detected at a late stage by a sustained decline in eGFR and/or the presence of significant albuminuria. With the aim of early and improved risk stratification of patients with CKD, we studied urinary peptides in a large cross-sectional multicenter cohort of 1990 individuals, including 522 with follow-up data, using proteome analysis. We validated that a previously established multipeptide urinary biomarker classifier performed significantly better in detecting and predicting progression of CKD than the current clinical standard, urinary albumin. The classifier was also more sensitive for identifying patients with rapidly progressing CKD. Compared with the combination of baseline eGFR and albuminuria (area under the curve [AUC]=0.758), the addition of the multipeptide biomarker classifier significantly improved CKD risk prediction (AUC=0.831) as assessed by the net reclassification index (0.303±-0.065; P<0.001) and integrated discrimination improvement (0.058±0.014; P<0.001). Correlation of individual urinary peptides with CKD stage and progression showed that the peptides that associated with CKD, irrespective of CKD stage or CKD progression, were either fragments of the major circulating proteins, suggesting failure of the glomerular filtration barrier sieving properties, or different collagen fragments, suggesting accumulation of intrarenal extracellular matrix. Furthermore, protein fragments associated with progression of CKD originated mostly from proteins related to inflammation and tissue repair. Results of this study suggest that urinary proteome analysis might significantly improve the current state of the art of CKD detection and outcome prediction and that identification of the urinary peptides allows insight into various ongoing pathophysiologic processes in CKD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.