Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25589608›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2015

A phylogenetic backbone for Bivalvia: an RNA-seq approach.

Vanessa L González, Sónia C S Andrade, Rüdiger Bieler, Timothy M Collins, Casey W Dunn, Paula M Mikkelsen, John D Taylor, Gonzalo Giribet

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed
18.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 137 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Molluscan mitochondrial genomes break the rules.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Review
  17. MolluscDB: a genome and transcriptome database for molluscs.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Vanessa L GonzálezMuseum of Comparative Zoology, Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.
Sónia C S AndradeMuseum of Comparative Zoology, Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.
Rüdiger BielerIntegrative Research Center, Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago, IL 60605, USA.
Timothy M CollinsDepartment of Biological Sciences, Florida International University, Miami, FL 33199, USA.
Casey W DunnDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA.
Paula M MikkelsenPaleontological Research Institution and Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14850, USA.
John D TaylorDepartment of Life Sciences, The Natural History Museum, London SW7 5BD, UK.
Gonzalo GiribetMuseum of Comparative Zoology, Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA ggiribet@g.harvard.edu.
Harvard University · USBrown University · USCornell University · USField Museum of Natural History · USFlorida International University · USNatural History Museum · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bivalves are an ancient and ubiquitous group of aquatic invertebrates with an estimated 10 000-20 000 living species. They are economically significant as a human food source, and ecologically important given their biomass and effects on communities. Their phylogenetic relationships have been studied for decades, and their unparalleled fossil record extends from the Cambrian to the Recent. Nevertheless, a robustly supported phylogeny of the deepest nodes, needed to fully exploit the bivalves as a model for testing macroevolutionary theories, is lacking. Here, we present the first phylogenomic approach for this important group of molluscs, including novel transcriptomic data for 31 bivalves obtained through an RNA-seq approach, and analyse these data with published genomes and transcriptomes of other bivalves plus outgroups. Our results provide a well-resolved, robust phylogenetic backbone for Bivalvia with all major lineages delineated, addressing long-standing questions about the monophyly of Protobranchia and Heterodonta, and resolving the position of particular groups such as Palaeoheterodonta, Archiheterodonta and Anomalodesmata. This now fully resolved backbone demonstrates that genomic approaches using hundreds of genes are feasible for resolving phylogenetic questions in bivalves and other animals.

Indexed as

TranscriptomeAnimalsBivalviaDNA, ComplementaryMolecular Sequence DataPhylogenySequence Analysis, RNADNA, Complementarybivalvesmolluscaphylogeneticsphylogenomics

Identifiers

PMID25589608
PMCPMC4308999
OpenAlexW2149998337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.