ArticleScientific reports2015
qPMS9: an efficient algorithm for quorum Planted Motif Search.
Article in Scientific reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Review on Planted (Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Freezing firefly algorithm for efficient planted (ℓ, d) motif search.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2022Article
- Novel algorithms for LDD motif search.BMC genomics · 2019Article
- SamSelect: a sample sequence selection algorithm for quorum planted motif search on large DNA datasets.BMC bioinformatics · 2018Article
- Parallel implementation of D-Phylo algorithm for maximum likelihood clusters.IET nanobiotechnology · 2017Article
- Efficient sequential and parallel algorithms for finding edit distance based motifs.BMC genomics · 2016Article
- RefSelect: a reference sequence selection algorithm for planted (l, d) motif search.BMC bioinformatics · 2016Article
- PairMotifChIP: A Fast Algorithm for Discovery of Patterns Conserved in Large ChIP-seq Data Sets.BioMed research international · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Discovering patterns in biological sequences is a crucial problem. For example, the identification of patterns in DNA sequences has resulted in the determination of open reading frames, identification of gene promoter elements, intron/exon splicing sites, and SH RNAs, location of RNA degradation signals, identification of alternative splicing sites, etc. In protein sequences, patterns have led to domain identification, location of protease cleavage sites, identification of signal peptides, protein interactions, determination of protein degradation elements, identification of protein trafficking elements, discovery of short functional motifs, etc. In this paper we focus on the identification of an important class of patterns, namely, motifs. We study the (ℓ, d) motif search problem or Planted Motif Search (PMS). PMS receives as input n strings and two integers ℓ and d. It returns all sequences M of length ℓ that occur in each input string, where each occurrence differs from M in at most d positions. Another formulation is quorum PMS (qPMS), where the motif appears in at least q% of the strings. We introduce qPMS9, a parallel exact qPMS algorithm that offers significant runtime improvements on DNA and protein datasets. qPMS9 solves the challenging DNA (ℓ, d)-instances (28, 12) and (30, 13). The source code is available at https://code.google.com/p/qpms9/.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.