Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25589440›Full record

ArticleGenome research2015

The Release 6 reference sequence of the Drosophila melanogaster genome.

Roger A Hoskins, Joseph W Carlson, Kenneth H Wan, Soo Park, Ivonne Mendez, Samuel E Galle, Benjamin W Booth, Barret D Pfeiffer, Reed A George, Robert Svirskas and 18 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 345 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
345citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

345 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. piRNA loss unleashes episodic transposition bursts.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Combining ultrastructure expansion microscopy with immunofluorescence and Oligopaint DNA FISH.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

285 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors.

Roger A HoskinsDepartment of Genome Dynamics, Life Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720, USA; RHoskins@lbl.gov celniker@fruitfly.org.
Joseph W CarlsonDepartment of Genome Dynamics, Life Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720, USA;
Kenneth H WanDepartment of Genome Dynamics, Life Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720, USA;
Soo ParkDepartment of Genome Dynamics, Life Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720, USA;
Ivonne MendezDepartment of Genome Dynamics, Life Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720, USA;
Samuel E GalleDepartment of Genome Dynamics, Life Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720, USA;
Benjamin W BoothDepartment of Genome Dynamics, Life Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720, USA;
Barret D PfeifferJanelia Farm Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, Virginia 20147, USA;
Reed A GeorgeJanelia Farm Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, Virginia 20147, USA;
Robert SvirskasJanelia Farm Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, Virginia 20147, USA;
Martin KrzywinskiGenome Sciences Centre, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 4S6, Canada;
Jacqueline ScheinGenome Sciences Centre, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 4S6, Canada;
Maria Carmela AccardoDipartimento di Biologia e Biotecnologie "Charles Darwin" and Istituto Pasteur Fondazione Cenci-Bolognetti, Sapienza Università di Roma, 00185 Roma, Italy;
Elisabetta DamiaDipartimento di Biologia e Biotecnologie "Charles Darwin" and Istituto Pasteur Fondazione Cenci-Bolognetti, Sapienza Università di Roma, 00185 Roma, Italy;
Giovanni MessinaDipartimento di Biologia e Biotecnologie "Charles Darwin" and Istituto Pasteur Fondazione Cenci-Bolognetti, Sapienza Università di Roma, 00185 Roma, Italy;
María Méndez-LagoCentro de Biología Molecular "Severo Ochoa" (CSIC-UAM), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28049 Madrid, Spain;
Beatriz de PablosCentro de Biología Molecular "Severo Ochoa" (CSIC-UAM), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28049 Madrid, Spain;
Olga V DemakovaInstitute of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russia;
Evgeniya N AndreyevaInstitute of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russia;
Lidiya V BoldyrevaInstitute of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russia;
Marco MarraGenome Sciences Centre, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 4S6, Canada;
A Bernardo CarvalhoDepartamento de Genética, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, CEP 21944-970, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil;
Patrizio DimitriDipartimento di Biologia e Biotecnologie "Charles Darwin" and Istituto Pasteur Fondazione Cenci-Bolognetti, Sapienza Università di Roma, 00185 Roma, Italy;
Alfredo VillasanteCentro de Biología Molecular "Severo Ochoa" (CSIC-UAM), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28049 Madrid, Spain;
Igor F ZhimulevInstitute of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russia; Novosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russia;
Gerald M RubinJanelia Farm Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, Virginia 20147, USA;
Gary H KarpenDepartment of Genome Dynamics, Life Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720, USA; Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, USA.
Susan E CelnikerDepartment of Genome Dynamics, Life Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720, USA; RHoskins@lbl.gov celniker@fruitfly.org.

Funding

TECHNICAL COREP50HG000750 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI PALAZZOLO, MICHAEL J · 1992 to 2002
$25.5M
The Drosophila Heterochromatin Genome ProjectR01HG000747 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIF-LAWRENC BERKELEY LAB · PI KARPEN, GARY H · 1992 to 2008
$9.3M
Completion of the Drosophila Gene CollectionR01HG002673 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIF-LAWRENC BERKELEY LAB · PI CELNIKER, SUSAN E · 2003 to 2008
$6.2M
Molecular Evolution of Drosophila Y ChromosomeR01GM064590 · NIGMS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY-UNIV PARK · PI CARVALHO, ANTONIO BERNARDO, CLARK, ANDREW G · 2002 to 2012
$2.0M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNHGRI NIH HHS P50 HG00750NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG000747NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG002673NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG00747NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM064590
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drosophila melanogaster plays an important role in molecular, genetic, and genomic studies of heredity, development, metabolism, behavior, and human disease. The initial reference genome sequence reported more than a decade ago had a profound impact on progress in Drosophila research, and improving the accuracy and completeness of this sequence continues to be important to further progress. We previously described improvement of the 117-Mb sequence in the euchromatic portion of the genome and 21 Mb in the heterochromatic portion, using a whole-genome shotgun assembly, BAC physical mapping, and clone-based finishing. Here, we report an improved reference sequence of the single-copy and middle-repetitive regions of the genome, produced using cytogenetic mapping to mitotic and polytene chromosomes, clone-based finishing and BAC fingerprint verification, ordering of scaffolds by alignment to cDNA sequences, incorporation of other map and sequence data, and validation by whole-genome optical restriction mapping. These data substantially improve the accuracy and completeness of the reference sequence and the order and orientation of sequence scaffolds into chromosome arm assemblies. Representation of the Y chromosome and other heterochromatic regions is particularly improved. The new 143.9-Mb reference sequence, designated Release 6, effectively exhausts clone-based technologies for mapping and sequencing. Highly repeat-rich regions, including large satellite blocks and functional elements such as the ribosomal RNA genes and the centromeres, are largely inaccessible to current sequencing and assembly methods and remain poorly represented. Further significant improvements will require sequencing technologies that do not depend on molecular cloning and that produce very long reads.

Indexed as

GenomeAnimalsChromosome MappingChromosomes, Artificial, BacterialComputational BiologyContig MappingDrosophila melanogasterHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceMolecular Sequence DataPolytene ChromosomesRestriction Mapping

Identifiers

PMID25589440
PMCPMC4352887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.