Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25588934›Full record

ArticleHealth education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education2015

The U.S. National Tips From Former Smokers Antismoking Campaign: Promoting Awareness of Smoking-Related Risks, Cessation Resources, and Cessation Behaviors.

Li-Ling Huang, James F Thrasher, Erika Nayeli Abad, K Michael Cummings, Maansi Bansal-Travers, Abraham Brown, Gera E Nagelhout

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Mass media interventions for smoking cessation in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  3. Effects of Current and Enhanced Tobacco Corrective Messages on Smokers' Intention to Quit Smoking and Intention to Purchase Cigarettes.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2020
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Impact of the Tips From Former Smokers Anti-Smoking Media Campaign on Youth Smoking Behaviors and Anti-Tobacco Attitudes.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2022
    Article
  9. Beliefs About the Health Effects of Smoking Among Adults in the United States.Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. The Impact of theJournal of smoking cessation · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Li-Ling HuangUniversity of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA huangl@email.unc.edu.
James F ThrasherUniversity of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico.
Erika Nayeli AbadNational Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico.
K Michael CummingsMedical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Maansi Bansal-TraversRosewell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Abraham BrownUniversity of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Gera E NagelhoutMaastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.

Funding

Training & Education Program p294-308P50CA180907 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI RIBISL, KURT M. · 2013 to 2017
$20.2M
Building evidence for effective and sustainable cigarette warning label policyR01CA167067 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI THRASHER, JAMES · 2012 to 2016
$2.7M
NCI NIH HHS 1P50CA18090701NCI NIH HHS P50 CA180907NCI NIH HHS R01 CA167067NCI NIH HHS R01CA167067
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveEvaluate the second flight of the U.S. Tips From Former Smokers (Tips) campaign.

methodData were analyzed from an online consumer panel of U.S. adult smokers before (n = 1,404) and after (n = 1,401) the 2013 Tips campaign launch. Generalized estimating equation models assessed whether the Tips advertisement recall was associated with knowledge about smoking-related risks in the Tips advertisements, awareness and use of a toll-free quitline and cessation websites, and quit attempts.

resultsSeventy-one percent of participants at Wave 2 reported that they recalled seeing at least one Tips advertisement. Smokers who recalled seeing a Tips advertisement were more likely to (a) show increases over baseline in knowledge of health risks such as amputation: 65% versus 34%, p < .001; blindness: 27% versus 12%, p < .001; and (b) to be aware of a quitline (41% vs. 30%, p < .001) and cessation website (28% vs. 20%, p < .001). Recall of Tips advertisements was also associated with greater likelihood of reporting having visited cessation websites (odds ratio [OR] = 1.62, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.27-2.06), having called a quitline (OR = 2.28, 95% CI = 1.61-3.24), and having made a quit attempt (OR = 1.18, 95% CI = 1.00-1.39), although these results were only statistically significant in the unadjusted models.

conclusionsThe 2013 Tips campaign was successful in increasing knowledge of health risks and awareness of tobacco cessation resources.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeSmoking PreventionAdolescentAdultAwarenessFemaleHealth PromotionHumansMaleMiddle AgedSmokingSmoking CessationUnited StatesYoung Adulthealth communicationhealth promotionmediaoutcome evaluationsmoking and tobacco use

Identifiers

PMID25588934
PMCPMC4501900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.