ArticleInternational surgery2015
Utility of endoscopy for diagnosis of barrett in a non-Western society: endoscopic and histopathologic correlation.
Article in International surgery, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prevalence of Barrett's Esophagus and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma With and Without Gastroesophageal Reflux: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2024Pooled it
- Effect of gastro-esophageal reflux symptoms on the risk of Barrett's esophagus: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2022Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Barrett esophagus is metaplastic transformation of esophageal squamous epithelium to columnar cells. A total of 1370 patients who had undergone upper endoscopy because of dyspeptic complaints were enrolled in the study. Age, sex, alcohol and smoking habits, body mass index, type and duration of symptoms (heartburn, epigastric pain, nausea, vomiting), and use of proton pump inhibitors were evaluated in all patients and recorded on standardized forms. Patients were grouped as normal esophagogastric junction, long-segment Barrett esophagus, and short-segment Barrett. Biopsies were taken from at least 6 points and examined histopathologically. Of the 1370 patients involved in the study, 748 (54.6%) were female and 622 (45.4%) were male. Mean age was 47.2 ± 15.30 years. Short-segment Barrett esophagus was detected in 16 patients, and long-segment Barrett was detected in 11 patients. Although Barrett esophagus was detected in 11 cases that were suspected to have Barrett during endoscopy, histopathology was negative in all cases that were not suspected to have Barrett. Barrett esophagus prevalence was significantly higher in people who used alcohol and tobacco and who had hiatal hernia. Although Barrett esophagus was detected in 40% of cases that were suspected to have Barrett during endoscopy, histopathology was negative in all cases that were not suspected to have Barrett. Barrett was detected in 40.7% of cases that were suspected to have Barrett during endoscopy; histopathology was negative in all cases that were not suspected to have Barrett. Senstivity of endoscopy is questionable in detection of short-segment Barrett.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.