Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25588611›Full record

ArticleClinical and translational science2015

A comparative study of patients' attitudes toward clinical research in the United States and urban and rural China.

Elizabeth Wu, Tianyi Wang, Tammy Lin, Xisui Chen, Zhe Guan, Claudia Cao, Huiying Rao, Ming Yang, Bo Feng, Sandra Pui and 5 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational science, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Elizabeth WuDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Tianyi Wang
Tammy Lin
Xisui Chen
Zhe Guan
Claudia Cao
Huiying Rao
Ming Yang
Bo Feng
Sandra Pui
Melvin Chan
Sherry Fu
Andy Lin
Lai Wei
Anna S Lok

Funding

University of Michigan Center for Gastrointestinal ResearchP30DK034933 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI WILEY, JOHN W · 1986 to 2021
$22.5M
NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK034933
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As the number of clinical trials conducted in China increases, understanding Chinese attitudes toward clinical research is critical for designing effective and ethical studies. Two survey studies were conducted in 2012 and 2013 to compare patient attitudes toward clinical research and factors affecting research participation in the United States and urban and rural China. We surveyed 525 patients in 2012 (186 US, 186 urban, 153 rural China) and 690 patients in 2013 (412 US, 206 urban, 72 rural China). US patients were more likely to have no concerns regarding research participation than Chinese patients. Most common concerns of US patients were safety, privacy and confidentiality, and time required. Safety was a top concern for many Chinese. Chinese patients, particularly rural Chinese, were more concerned about the likelihood of self-benefit, and receiving free medical care and financial incentive had greater influence on their participation. Being informed of the freedom to choose whether to participate or to leave a study was less important to Chinese patients. Our study provides important insights into Chinese patients' attitudes toward clinical research and the need to educate them about their rights. These findings help in designing cross-cultural clinical studies that maximize enrollment while upholding Western ethical standards.

Indexed as

Attitude to HealthCultural CharacteristicsMotivationAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomedical ResearchChinaFemaleHumansInformed ConsentMaleMiddle AgedPatient ParticipationPatient SafetyRural Populationcultural differencesenrollmentfinancial incentivesinformed consentprivacysafety

Identifiers

PMID25588611
PMCPMC5350978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.