Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25588155›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2015

Descriptive analysis of antibiotic-resistant patterns of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) st398 isolated from healthy swine.

Ana Morcillo, Beatriz Castro, Cristobalina Rodríguez-Alvarez, Rossana Abreu, Armando Aguirre-Jaime, Angeles Arias

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Prevalence and Characteristics ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ana MorcilloDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University of La Laguna, Canary Islands 38071, Spain. anaimorcillo@gmail.com.
Beatriz CastroUniversity Hospital of the Canary Islands, San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Tenerife, Canary Islands 38320, Spain. bcastrohdez@yahoo.es.
Cristobalina Rodríguez-AlvarezDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University of La Laguna, Canary Islands 38071, Spain. crrodrig@ull.es.
Rossana AbreuDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University of La Laguna, Canary Islands 38071, Spain. rabreu@ull.es.
Armando Aguirre-JaimeNuestra Señora de la Candelaria University Hospital, Santa Cruz de Tenerife 38010, Spain. aagujai@gobiernodecanarias.org.
Angeles AriasDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University of La Laguna, Canary Islands 38071, Spain. angarias@ull.es.
Universidad de La Laguna · ESHospital Universitario de Canarias · ESHospital Universitario Nuestra Señora de Candelaria · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLivestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) such as the MRSA ST398 strain has spread all over the world and the most worrying aspect of this fact appears to be its capacity to easily spread to humans. The excessive use of antibiotics has made swine a reservoir of MRSA. The aim of the present study was to determine the antibiotic resistance profile of MRSA samples isolated from healthy swine of the island of Tenerife (Spain).

methodsA total of 256 MRSA isolates from swine samples and five MRSA isolates from pig worker samples were investigated for MRSA antibiotic resistant patterns.

resultsAnalysis of the susceptibility status of MRSA pig isolates revealed that 39 isolates were resistant to one antibiotic, 71 isolates were resistant to two antibiotics and 96 isolates were resistant to three or more antibiotics. SCCmec typing revealed the presence of types IV and V. Isolates having SCCmec IV had an increased resistance to the antimicrobial agents tested than those having SCCmec V. We observed significant differences when comparing the most common resistance patterns and SCCmec type.

conclusionsMRSA isolated from humans showed similar resistance to those isolated from pigs, excepting erythromycin, since all the workers' isolates were sensitive to this antibiotic. The evolution of new MRSA clones has emphasized the need for infection control practices in animals and humans in close contact.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsCross-Sectional StudiesDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialFarmersHumansMethicillinMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusMicrobial Sensitivity TestsSpainSus scrofaAnti-Bacterial AgentsMethicillin

Identifiers

PMID25588155
PMCPMC4306882
OpenAlexW2020503020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.