Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25588136›Full record

SynthesisMedical care2015

A systematic review of intervention studies to prevent hospitalizations of community-dwelling older adults with dementia.

Elizabeth A Phelan, Katrina J Debnam, Lynda A Anderson, Steven B Owens

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Medical care, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Elizabeth A Phelan*Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Division of Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine †Department of Health Services, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA ‡Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD §Healthy Aging Program, Division of Population Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA ∥Directors of Health Promotion and Education, Washington, DC.
Katrina J Debnam
Lynda A Anderson
Steven B Owens

Funding

National Organizations For Chronic Disease Prevention and Health PromotionU58DP002846 · DP · DIRECTORS OF HEALTH PROMOTION/ EDUCATION · PI GOEKLER, SUSAN · 2010 to 2014
$13.8M
NCCDPHP CDC HHS DP2846-05NCCDPHP CDC HHS U58 DP002846
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo conduct a systematic literature review to determine if there were any intervention strategies that had any measurable effect on acute-care hospitalizations among community-dwelling adults with dementia.

designStudies were identified by a professional research librarian and content experts.

settingCommunity dwelling.

participantsParticipants were diagnosed with dementia, severity ranging from mild to severe, and were recruited from health care and community agencies. MEASUREMENTS: A study met the inclusion criteria if it: (a) was published in English; (b) included a control or comparison group; (c) published outcome data from the intervention under study; (d) reported hospitalization as one of the outcomes; (e) included community-dwelling older adults; and (f) enrolled participants with dementia. Ten studies met all inclusion criteria.

resultsOf the 10 studies included, most assessed health services use (ie, hospitalizations) as a secondary outcome. Participants were recruited from a range of health care and community agencies, and most were diagnosed with dementia with severity ratings ranging from mild to severe. Most intervention strategies consisted of face-to-face assessments of the persons living with dementia, their caregivers, and the development and implementation of a care plan. A significant reduction in hospital admissions was not found in any of the included studies, although 1 study did observe a reduction in hospital days.

conclusionsThe majority of studies included hospitalizations as a secondary outcome. Only 1 intervention was found to have an effect on hospitalizations. Future work would benefit from strategies specifically designed to reduce and prevent acute hospitalizations in persons with dementia.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overDementiaFemaleHomes for the AgedHospitalizationHumansMaleNursing HomesOutcome Assessment, Health CarePatient Care Management

Identifiers

PMID25588136
PMCPMC4310672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.