Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25588043›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Ontology-based data integration between clinical and research systems.

Sebastian Mate, Felix Köpcke, Dennis Toddenroth, Marcus Martin, Hans-Ulrich Prokosch, Thomas Bürkle, Thomas Ganslandt

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Clinical Data Warehousing: A Scoping Review.Journal of the Society for Clinical Data Management · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Merging heterogeneous clinical data to enable knowledge discovery.Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Enabling semantic queries across federated bioinformatics databases.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sebastian MateInstitute for Medical Informatics, University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Felix KöpckeCenter for Medical Information and Communication, Erlangen University Hospital, Erlangen, Germany.
Dennis ToddenrothInstitute for Medical Informatics, University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Marcus MartinTumor Centre, Erlangen University Hospital, Erlangen, Germany.
Hans-Ulrich ProkoschInstitute for Medical Informatics, University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany; Center for Medical Information and Communication, Erlangen University Hospital, Erlangen, Germany.
Thomas BürkleInstitute for Medical Informatics, Bern University of Applied Sciences, Bern, Switzerland.
Thomas GanslandtCenter for Medical Information and Communication, Erlangen University Hospital, Erlangen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Data from the electronic medical record comprise numerous structured but uncoded elements, which are not linked to standard terminologies. Reuse of such data for secondary research purposes has gained in importance recently. However, the identification of relevant data elements and the creation of database jobs for extraction, transformation and loading (ETL) are challenging: With current methods such as data warehousing, it is not feasible to efficiently maintain and reuse semantically complex data extraction and trans-formation routines. We present an ontology-supported approach to overcome this challenge by making use of abstraction: Instead of defining ETL procedures at the database level, we use ontologies to organize and describe the medical concepts of both the source system and the target system. Instead of using unique, specifically developed SQL statements or ETL jobs, we define declarative transformation rules within ontologies and illustrate how these constructs can then be used to automatically generate SQL code to perform the desired ETL procedures. This demonstrates how a suitable level of abstraction may not only aid the interpretation of clinical data, but can also foster the reutilization of methods for un-locking it.

Indexed as

Biological OntologiesDatabases, FactualElectronic Health RecordsAlgorithmsHumansResearchSemanticsSoftware

Identifiers

PMID25588043
PMCPMC4294641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.