Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25587357›Full record

ArticleGenome medicine2014

A multi-gene signature predicts outcome in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Syed Haider, Jun Wang, Ai Nagano, Ami Desai, Prabhu Arumugam, Laurent Dumartin, Jude Fitzgibbon, Thorsten Hagemann, John F Marshall, Hemant M Kocher and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 88 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
88citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

88 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 151 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. METTL3-driven mJournal of translational medicine · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Deciphering of SOX9 Functions in Pancreatic Cancer Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Co‑expression ofOncology letters · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

28 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Syed HaiderCentre for Molecular Oncology, Barts Cancer Institute, London, United Kingdom.
Jun WangCentre for Molecular Oncology, Barts Cancer Institute, London, United Kingdom.
Ai NaganoCentre for Molecular Oncology, Barts Cancer Institute, London, United Kingdom.
Ami DesaiCentre for Tumour Biology, Barts Cancer Institute, London, United Kingdom.
Prabhu ArumugamCentre for Tumour Biology, Barts Cancer Institute, London, United Kingdom.
Laurent DumartinCentre for Molecular Oncology, Barts Cancer Institute, London, United Kingdom.
Jude FitzgibbonCentre for Haemato-Oncology, Barts Cancer Institute, London, United Kingdom.
Thorsten HagemannCentre for Cancer and Inflammation, Barts Cancer Institute, London, United Kingdom.
John F MarshallCentre for Tumour Biology, Barts Cancer Institute, London, United Kingdom.
Hemant M KocherCentre for Tumour Biology, Barts Cancer Institute, London, United Kingdom.
Tatjana Crnogorac-JurcevicCentre for Molecular Oncology, Barts Cancer Institute, London, United Kingdom.
Aldo ScarpaARC-Net Research Centre and Department of Pathology and Diagnostics, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Nicholas R LemoineCentre for Molecular Oncology, Barts Cancer Institute, London, United Kingdom.
Claude ChelalaCentre for Molecular Oncology, Barts Cancer Institute, London, United Kingdom.
Rust College · US

Funding

Cancer Research UK 12008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImproved usage of the repertoires of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) profiles is crucially needed to guide the development of predictive and prognostic tools that could inform the selection of treatment options.

methodsUsing publicly available mRNA abundance datasets, we performed a large retrospective meta-analysis on 466 PDAC patients to discover prognostic gene signatures. These signatures were trained on two clinical cohorts (n = 70), and validated on four independent clinical cohorts (n = 246). Further validation of the identified gene signature was performed using quantitative real-time RT-PCR.

resultsWe identified 225 candidate prognostic genes. Using these, a 36-gene signature was discovered and validated on fully independent clinical cohorts (hazard ratio (HR) = 2.06, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.51 to 2.81, P = 3.62 × 10(-6), n = 246). This signature serves as a good alternative prognostic stratification marker compared to tumour grade (HR = 2.05, 95% CI = 1.45 to 2.88, P = 3.18 × 10(-5)) and tumour node metastasis (TNM) stage (HR = 1.13, 95% CI = 0.66 to 1.94, P = 0.67). Upon multivariate analysis with adjustment for TNM stage and tumour grade, the 36-gene signature remained an independent prognostic predictor of clinical outcome (HR = 2.21, 95% CI = 1.17 to 4.16, P = 0.01). Univariate assessment revealed higher expression of ITGA5, SEMA3A, KIF4A, IL20RB, SLC20A1, CDC45, PXN, SSX3 and TMEM26 was correlated with shorter survival while B3GNT1, NOSTRIN and CADPS down-regulation was associated with poor outcome.

conclusionsOur 36-gene classifier is able to prognosticate PDAC independent of patient cohort and microarray platforms. Further work on the functional roles, downstream events and interactions of the signature genes is likely to reveal true molecular candidates for PDAC therapeutics.

Identifiers

PMID25587357
PMCPMC4293116
OpenAlexW2134080417

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.