Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25587240›Full record

ArticleBMC palliative care2014

Unbearable suffering and requests for euthanasia prospectively studied in end-of-life cancer patients in primary care.

Cees Dm Ruijs, Gerrit van der Wal, Ad Jfm Kerkhof, Bregje D Onwuteaka-Philipsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC palliative care, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Factors That Influence Access to Medical Assistance in Dying Services: An Integrative Review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Suffering and dying well: on the proper aim of palliative care.Medicine, health care, and philosophy · 2017
    Article
  15. The value of life in English law: revered but not sacred?Legal studies (Society of Legal Scholars) · 2016
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Cees Dm RuijsDepartment of Public and Occupational Health, VU University Medical Center, EMGO+ Institute, Expertise Center for Palliative Care, van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands ; Primary Care Center De Greev, Grevelingenstraat 10, 3522 PR Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Gerrit van der WalDepartment of Public and Occupational Health, VU University Medical Center, EMGO+ Institute, Expertise Center for Palliative Care, van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ad Jfm KerkhofDepartment of Clinical Psychology, VU University, EMGO+ Institute, van der Boechorststraat 1, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Bregje D Onwuteaka-PhilipsenDepartment of Public and Occupational Health, VU University Medical Center, EMGO+ Institute, Expertise Center for Palliative Care, van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAn international discussion about whether or not to legally permit euthanasia and (or) physician assisted suicide (EAS) is ongoing. Unbearable suffering in patients may result in a request for EAS. In the Netherlands EAS is legally permitted, and unbearable suffering is one of the central compulsory criteria. The majority of EAS is performed in cancer patients in the primary care practice. In around one in every seven end-of-life cancer patients dying in the primary care setting EAS is performed. The prevalence of unbearable symptoms and overall unbearable suffering in relationship to explicit requests for EAS was studied in a cohort of end-of-life cancer patients in primary care.

methodsA prospective study in primary care cancer patients estimated to die within six months was performed. Every two months suffering was assessed with the State-of-Suffering V (SOS-V). The SOS-V is a comprehensive instrument for quantitative and qualitative assessment of unbearable suffering related to 69 physical, psychological and social symptoms in five domains.

resultsOut of 148 patients who were asked to participate 76 (51%) entered the study. The studied population were 64 patients who were followed up until death; 27% explicitly requested EAS, which was performed in 8% of the patients. The final interview per patient was analyzed; in four patients the SOS-V was missing. Unbearable symptoms were present in 94% of patients with an explicit request for EAS and in 87% of patients without an explicit request. No differences were found in the prevalence of unbearable suffering for physical, psychological, social and existential symptoms, nor for overall unbearable suffering, between patients who did or who did not explicitly request EAS.

conclusionsIn a population of end-of-life cancer patients cared for in primary care no differences in unbearable suffering were found between patients with and without explicit requests for EAS. The study raises the question whether unbearable suffering is the dominant motive to request for EAS. Most patients suffered from unbearable symptoms, indicating that the compulsory criterion of unbearable suffering may be met a priori in most end-of-life cancer patients dying at home, whether they request EAS or not.

Identifiers

PMID25587240
PMCPMC4292985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.