Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25587110›Full record

ArticleCancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology2015

Sun protection practices and sun exposure among children with a parental history of melanoma.

Beth A Glenn, Tiffany Lin, L Cindy Chang, Ashley Okada, Weng Kee Wong, Karen Glanz, Roshan Bastani

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Systematic Review of Pediatric Photoprotection in Children of Color.International journal of women's dermatology · 2025
    Article
  7. Observational
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Beth A GlennUCLA Fielding School of Public Health and Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, California. bglenn@ucla.edu.
Tiffany LinUCLA Fielding School of Public Health and Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, California.
L Cindy ChangUCLA Fielding School of Public Health and Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, California.
Ashley OkadaUCLA Fielding School of Public Health and Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, California.
Weng Kee WongUCLA Fielding School of Public Health and Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, California.
Karen GlanzPerelman School of Medicine and School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Roshan BastaniUCLA Fielding School of Public Health and Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, California.
Comprehensive Cardiovascular · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Sun Protection Among Children with a Family History of MelanomaR03CA134205 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI GLENN, BETH A. · 2009 to 2010
$154k
NCI NIH HHS R03 CA134205NCI NIH HHS R03CA134205
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFirst-degree relatives of melanoma survivors have a substantially higher lifetime risk for melanoma than individuals with no family history. Exposure to ultraviolet radiation (UVR) is the primary modifiable risk factor for the disease. Reducing UV exposure through sun protection may be particularly important for children with a parental history of melanoma. Nonetheless, limited prior research has investigated sun protection practices and sun exposure among these children.

methodsThe California Cancer Registry was used to identify melanoma survivors eligible to participate in a survey to assess their children's sun protection practices and sun exposure. The survey was administered by mail, telephone, or web to Latino and non-Latino white melanoma survivors with at least one child (0-17 years; N = 324).

resultsSun exposure was high and the rate of sunburn was equivalent to or higher than estimates from average-risk populations. Use of sun protection was suboptimal. Latino children were less likely to wear sunscreen and hats and more likely to wear sunglasses, although these differences disappeared in adjusted analyses. Increasing age of the child was associated with lower sun protection and higher risk for sunburn, whereas higher objective risk for melanoma predicted improved sun protection and a higher risk for sunburns. Perception of high barriers to sun protection was the strongest modifiable correlate of sun protection.

conclusionsInterventions to improve sun protection and reduce sun exposure and sunburns in high-risk children are needed. IMPACT: Intervening in high-risk populations may help reduce the burden of melanoma in the United States.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultChildData CollectionFemaleHumansMaleMelanomaMiddle AgedRisk FactorsSkin NeoplasmsSunbathingYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID25587110
PMCPMC4295624
OpenAlexW2172075947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.