Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25586885›Full record

ArticleResearch in social & administrative pharmacy : RSAP

Barriers and facilitators of medication reconciliation processes for recently discharged patients from community pharmacists' perspectives.

Korey A Kennelty, Betty Chewning, Meg Wise, Amy Kind, Tonya Roberts, David Kreling

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research in social & administrative pharmacy : RSAP. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. AI-Based Automation for Medication Reconciliation: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Provision of medication supply at hospital discharge: A rapid scoping review of the "Meds-to-Beds" care model.American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Importance of medication reconciliation in cancer patients.Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Implementation and sustainability of a medication reconciliation toolkit: A mixed methods evaluation.American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists · 2020
    Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Korey A KenneltyGeriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center (GRECC), William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital, Madison, WI, USA; University of Wisconsin-Madison, School of Pharmacy, Sonderegger Research Center, Madison, WI, USA. Electronic address: kennelty@wisc.edu.
Betty ChewningUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison, School of Pharmacy, Sonderegger Research Center, Madison, WI, USA.
Meg WiseUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison, School of Pharmacy, Sonderegger Research Center, Madison, WI, USA.
Amy KindGeriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center (GRECC), William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital, Madison, WI, USA; University of Wisconsin-Madison, Department of Medicine, Division of Geriatrics, Madison, WI, USA.
Tonya RobertsGeriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center (GRECC), William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital, Madison, WI, USA; University of Wisconsin-Madison, School of Nursing, USA.
David KrelingUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison, School of Pharmacy, Sonderegger Research Center, Madison, WI, USA.
University of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

Institutional Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR000427 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI DREZNER, MARC KENNETH · 2012 to 2016
$32.2M
INSTITUTIONAL CTSA (UW-MADISON): CLINICAL TRIALSUL1RR025011 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI DREZNER, MARC KENNETH · 2007 to 2011
$29.5M
Wisconsin Alzheimer's Disease Research CenterP50AG033514 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI KIND, AMY J. · 2009 to 2018
$16.2M
The Hospital Discharge Summary's Impact on Sub-Acute Care Patient OutcomesK23AG034551 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI KIND, AMY J. · 2010 to 2012
$556k
Medication List Consistency When Patients Transition from Hospital to CommunityR36HS021984 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI KENNELTY, KOREY A · 2012 to 2012
$39k
AHRQ HHS 1R36HS021984-01AHRQ HHS R36 HS021984NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000427NCATS NIH HHS UL1TR000427NCRR NIH HHS 1UL1RR025011 FROM THE CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONALNCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR025011NIA NIH HHS K23 AG034551NIA NIH HHS K23AG034551NIA NIH HHS P50 AG033514
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCommunity pharmacists play a vital part in reconciling medications for patients transitioning from hospital to community care, yet their roles have not been fully examined in the extant literature.

objectivesThe objectives of this study were to: 1) examine the barriers and facilitators community pharmacists face when reconciling medications for recently discharged patients; and 2) identify pharmacists' preferred content and modes of information transfer regarding updated medication information for recently discharged patients.

methodsCommunity pharmacists were purposively and conveniently sampled from the Wisconsin (U.S. state) pharmacist-based research network, Pharmacy Practice Enhancement and Action Research Link (PEARL Rx). Community pharmacists were interviewed face-to-face, and transcriptions from audio recordings were analyzed using directed content analysis. The Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) guided the development of questions for the semi-structured interviews.

resultsInterviewed community pharmacists (N = 10) described the medication reconciliation process to be difficult and time-consuming for recently discharged patients. In the context of the TPB, more barriers than facilitators of reconciling medications were revealed. Themes were categorized as organizational and individual-level themes. Major organizational-level factors affecting the medication reconciliation process included: pharmacy resources, discharge communication, and hospital resources. Major individual-level factors affecting the medication reconciliation process included: pharmacists' perceived responsibility, relationships, patient perception of pharmacist, and patient characteristics. Interviewed pharmacists consistently responded that several pieces of information items would be helpful when reconciling medications for recently discharged patients, including the hospital medication discharge list and stop-orders for discontinued medications.

conclusionsThe TPB was useful for identifying barriers and facilitators of medication reconciliation for recently discharged patients from community pharmacists' perspectives. The elucidation of these specific facilitators and barriers suggest promising avenues for future research interventions to improve exchange of medication information between the community pharmacy, hospitals, and patients.

Indexed as

Community Pharmacy ServicesPatient DischargePharmacistsProfessional-Patient RelationsTransitional CareAttitude of Health PersonnelFemaleHumansMaleMedication ReconciliationCommunity pharmacyMedication reconciliationQualitative methodsTransitions of care

Identifiers

PMID25586885
PMCPMC4409924
OpenAlexW2116755860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.