Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25586875›Full record

ArticleJournal of computational neuroscience2015

Subthreshold amplitude and phase resonance in models of quadratic type: nonlinear effects generated by the interplay of resonant and amplifying currents.

Horacio G Rotstein

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computational neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Dynamics of interaction betweenCognitive neurodynamics · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Computational Neuroscience: Mathematical and Statistical Perspectives.Annual review of statistics and its application · 2018
    Article
  16. IJournal of neurophysiology · 2018
    Article
  17. Resonance Properties in Auditory Brainstem Neurons.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Horacio G RotsteinDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ, 07102, USA, horacio@njit.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We investigate the biophysical and dynamic mechanisms of generation of subthreshold amplitude and phase resonance in response to sinusoidal input currents in two-dimensional models of quadratic type. These models feature a parabolic voltage nullcline and a linear nullcline for the recovery gating variable, capturing the interplay of the so-called resonant currents (e.g., hyperpolarization-activated mixed-cation inward and slow potassium) and amplifying currents (e.g., persistent sodium) in biophysically realistic parameter regimes. These currents underlie the generation of resonance in medial entorhinal cortex layer II stellate cells and CA1 pyramidal cells. We show that quadratic models exhibit nonlinear amplifications of the voltage response to sinusoidal inputs in the resonant frequency band. These are expressed as an increase in the impedance profile as the input amplitude increases. They are stronger for values positive than negative to resting potential and are accompanied by a shift in the phase profile, a decrease in the resonant and phase-resonant frequencies, and an increase in the sharpness of the voltage response. These effects are more prominent for smaller values of ∊ (larger levels of the time scale separation between the voltage and the resonant gating variable) and for values of the resting potential closer to threshold for spike generation. All other parameter fixed, as ∊ increases the voltage response becomes "more linear"; i.e., the nonlinearities are present, but "ignored". In addition, the nonlinear effects are strongly modulated by the curvature of the parabolic voltage nullcline (partially reflecting the effects of the amplifying current) and the slope of the resonant current activation curve. Following the effects of changes in the biophysical conductances of realistic conductance-based models through the parameters of the quadratic model, we characterize the qualitatively different effects that resonant and amplifying currents have on the nonlinear properties of the voltage response. We identify different classes of resonant currents, represented by h- and slow potassium, according to whether they enhance (h-) or attenuate (slow potassium) the nonlinear effects. Finally, we use dynamical systems tools to investigate the dynamic mechanisms of generation of resonance and phase-resonance. We show that the nonlinear effects on the voltage response (e.g., amplification of the voltage response in the resonant frequency band and shifts in the resonant and phase-resonant frequencies) result from the ability of limit cycle trajectories to follow the unstable (right) branch of the voltage nullcline for a significant amount of time. This is a canard-related mechanism that has been shown to underlie the generation of intrinsic subthreshold oscillations in quadratic type models such as medial entorhinal cortex stellate cells. Overall, our results highlight the complexity of the voltage response to oscillatory inputs in nonlinear models and the roles that resonant and amplifying currents have in shaping these responses.

Indexed as

BiophysicsModels, NeurologicalAnimalsMembrane PotentialsNeuronsNonlinear DynamicsPotassium ChannelsSodium ChannelsPotassium ChannelsSodium Channels

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.