Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25586868›Full record

Observational studyJournal of general internal medicine2015

Unveiling SEER-CAHPS®: a new data resource for quality of care research.

Neetu Chawla, Matthew Urato, Anita Ambs, Nicola Schussler, Ron D Hays, Steven B Clauser, Alan M Zaslavsky, Kayo Walsh, Margot Schwartz, Michael Halpern and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of general internal medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The use of proxies and proxy-reported measures: a report of the international society for quality of life research (ISOQOL) proxy task force.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Baseline characteristics of survivors, primary care clinicians, and oncologists in a randomized trial of a shared care, self-management intervention for cancer survivors.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Neetu ChawlaDivision of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Cancer Prevention Fellow, National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical Center Drive, 3E450, Rockville, MD, 20892, USA, neetu.chawla@nih.gov.
Matthew Urato
Anita Ambs
Nicola Schussler
Ron D Hays
Steven B Clauser
Alan M Zaslavsky
Kayo Walsh
Margot Schwartz
Michael Halpern
Sarah Gaillot
Elizabeth H Goldstein
Neeraj K Arora
National Cancer Institute · USRTI International · USCenters for Medicare and Medicaid Services · USHarvard University · USInformation Management Services · USPatient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

Research ProjectU54CA153499 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI CHEN, MOON SHAO-CHUANG, CHOW, EDWARD A. · 2010 to 2015
$6.7M
NCI NIH HHS HHSN261201000024CNCI NIH HHS HHSN261201000026CNCI NIH HHS HHSN261201000027CNCI NIH HHS HHSN261201000028CNCI NIH HHS HHSN261201000029CNCI NIH HHS HHSN261201000030CNCI NIH HHS HHSN261201000031CNCI NIH HHS HHSN261201000032CNCI NIH HHS HHSN261201000033CNCI NIH HHS HHSN261201000034CNCI NIH HHS HHSN261201000035CNCI NIH HHS HHSN261201000035INCI NIH HHS HHSN261201000037CNCI NIH HHS HHSN261201000140CNCI NIH HHS U54 CA153499NCI NIH HHS Y1-PC-0064
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSince 1990, the National Cancer Institute (NCI) and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) have collaborated to create linked data resources to improve our understanding of patterns of care, health care costs, and trends in utilization. However, existing data linkages have not included measures of patient experiences with care.

objectiveTo describe a new resource for quality of care research based on a linkage between the Medicare Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS®) patient surveys and the NCI's Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) data.

designThis is an observational study of CAHPS respondents and includes both fee-for-service and Medicare Advantage beneficiaries with and without cancer. The data linkage includes: CAHPS survey data collected between 1998 and 2010 to assess patient reports on multiple aspects of their care, such as access to needed and timely care, doctor communication, as well as patients' global ratings of their personal doctor, specialists, overall health care, and their health plan; SEER registry data (1973-2007) on cancer site, stage, treatment, death information, and patient demographics; and longitudinal Medicare claims data (2002-2011) for fee-for-service beneficiaries on utilization and costs of care.

participantsIn total, 150,750 respondents were in the cancer cohort and 571,318 were in the non-cancer cohort. MAIN MEASURES: The data linkage includes SEER data on cancer site, stage, treatment, death information, and patient demographics, in addition to longitudinal data from Medicare claims and information on patient experiences from CAHPS surveys. KEY

resultsSizable proportions of cases from common cancers (e.g., breast, colorectal, prostate) and short-term survival cancers (e.g., pancreas) by time since diagnosis enable comparisons across the cancer care trajectory by MA vs. FFS coverage.

conclusionsSEER-CAHPS is a valuable resource for information about Medicare beneficiaries' experiences of care across different diagnoses and treatment modalities, and enables comparisons by type of insurance.

Indexed as

Quality Assurance, Health CareAgedDatabases, FactualFemaleHealth Services ResearchHumansMaleMedicareMiddle AgedNational Cancer Institute (U.S.)Patient SatisfactionProgram EvaluationSEER ProgramUnited States

Identifiers

PMID25586868
PMCPMC4395616
OpenAlexW2139128287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.