Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25586605›Full record

ReviewLeukemia & lymphoma2015

Asparaginase pharmacokinetics and implications of therapeutic drug monitoring.

Barbara Asselin, Carmelo Rizzari

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Leukemia & lymphoma, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 77 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
77citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

77 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 184 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Activity and toxicity of intramuscular 1000 iu/mBritish journal of haematology · 2022
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Prevention of Subsequent L-Asparaginase Hypersensitivity in Children Through Premedication: A Single-Center Experience.The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG · 2026
    Article
  12. A Review of the Role of Neuroimaging in Neurotoxicity Monitoring in Children with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Barbara Asselina Department of Pediatrics , Golisano Children's Hospital, University of Rochester School of Medicine , Rochester , NY , USA.
Carmelo Rizzarib Department of Pediatrics , Pediatric Hematology-Oncology Unit, University of Milano-Bicocca, MBBM Foundation, San Gerardo Hospital , Monza , Italy.
Golisano Children's Hospital · USUniversity of Milano-Bicocca · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Asparaginase is widely used in chemotherapeutic regimens for the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and has led to a substantial improvement in cure rates, especially in children. Optimal therapeutic effects depend on a complete and sustained depletion of serum asparagine. However, pronounced interpatient variability, differences in pharmacokinetic properties between asparaginases and the formation of asparaginase antibodies make it difficult to predict the degree of asparagine depletion that will result from a given dose of asparaginase. The pharmacological principles underlying asparaginase therapy in the treatment of ALL are summarized in this article. A better understanding of the many factors that influence asparaginase activity and subsequent asparagine depletion may allow physicians to tailor treatment to the individual, maximizing therapeutic effect and minimizing treatment-related toxicity. Therapeutic drug monitoring provides a means of assessing a patient's current depletion status and can be used to better evaluate the potential benefit of treatment adjustments.

Indexed as

Drug MonitoringAntineoplastic AgentsAsparaginaseAsparagineClinical Trials as TopicEnzyme ActivationGlutamineHumansPrecursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-LymphomaTreatment OutcomeAntineoplastic AgentsAsparaginaseAsparagineGlutamineacute lymphoblastic leukemiaAsparaginasehypersensitivitypharmacokineticssilent inactivationtherapeutic drug monitoring

Identifiers

PMID25586605
PMCPMC4732456
OpenAlexW2134716997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.