Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25586327›Full record

ArticleStatistical methods in medical research2017

Statistical interactions and Bayes estimation of log odds in case-control studies.

Jaya M Satagopan, Sara H Olson, Robert C Elston

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistical methods in medical research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jaya M Satagopan1 Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Sara H Olson1 Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Robert C Elston2 Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Clinical and Translational Science Collaborative of ClevelandUL1TR000439 · NCATS · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI KONSTAN, MICHAEL W. · 2012 to 2016
$50.0M
CTSA INFRASTRUCTURE FOR PEDIATRIC RESEARCHUL1RR024996 · NCRR · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI IMPERATO-MCGINLEY, JULIANNE L · 2007 to 2011
$49.6M
ESTROGEN, DIET, GENETICS AND ENDOMETRIAL CANCERR01CA083918 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI OLSON, SARA H · 2001 to 2005
$2.5M
Study of exposures and biomarkers in cancer epidemiologyR01CA197402 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI SATAGOPAN, JAYA M · 2016 to 2019
$1.6M
STUDY OF EXPOSURES, BEHAVIORS, AND BIOMARKERS IN CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGYR01CA137420 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI SATAGOPAN, JAYA M · 2009 to 2012
$1.6M
Role of Mitochondrial CYP2E1 in Chemical Exposure-Driven NeurodegenerationF32ES027306 · NIEHS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI HARTMAN, JESSICA HELENE · 2016 to 2018
$171k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000439NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS R01 CA083918NCI NIH HHS R01 CA137420NCI NIH HHS R01 CA197402NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024996NIEHS NIH HHS 27306C0004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper is concerned with the estimation of the logarithm of disease odds (log odds) when evaluating two risk factors, whether or not interactions are present. Statisticians define interaction as a departure from an additive model on a certain scale of measurement of the outcome. Certain interactions, known as removable interactions, may be eliminated by fitting an additive model under an invertible transformation of the outcome. This can potentially provide more precise estimates of log odds than fitting a model with interaction terms. In practice, we may also encounter nonremovable interactions. The model must then include interaction terms, regardless of the choice of the scale of the outcome. However, in practical settings, we do not know at the outset whether an interaction exists, and if so whether it is removable or nonremovable. Rather than trying to decide on significance levels to test for the existence of removable and nonremovable interactions, we develop a Bayes estimator based on a squared error loss function. We demonstrate the favorable bias-variance trade-offs of our approach using simulations, and provide empirical illustrations using data from three published endometrial cancer case-control studies. The methods are implemented in an R program, and available freely at http://www.mskcc.org/biostatistics/~satagopj .

Indexed as

Bayes TheoremModels, StatisticalBiostatisticsCase-Control StudiesComputer SimulationData Interpretation, StatisticalEndometrial NeoplasmsFemaleHumansLinear ModelsLogistic ModelsRisk FactorsBayes estimatorcompositional epistasislogistic linkmean squared errorminimax estimatornonremovable interactionremovable interactiontransformation

Identifiers

PMID25586327
PMCPMC4834280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.