Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25586231›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine2015

Integrating mental health into adolescent annual visits: impact of previsit comprehensive screening on within-visit processes.

Anne M Gadomski, Kate E Fothergill, Susan Larson, Lawrence S Wissow, Heather Winegrad, Zsolt J Nagykaldi, Ardis L Olson, Debra L Roter

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07658937 (Improving Sexual and Reproductive Health Communication Between Adolescent and Young Adult Oncology Patients and Clinicians), which is not on this map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07658937 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Improving Sexual and Reproductive Health Communication Between Adolescent and Young Adult Oncology Patients and Clinicians: ReSPECT Intervention Proof-of-Concept Testing

TypeinterventionalSponsorConnecticut Children's Medical CenterRan2026 to 2029Enrolled30ConditionsHealth-Related Quality-of-Life, Cancer, Health CommunicationArmsReSPECT
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Screening for Gender Identity in Adolescent Well Visits: Is It Feasible and Acceptable?The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Screening for Depression in Pediatric Primary Care.Current psychiatry reports · 2018
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Physician Intervention to Positive Depression Screens Among Adolescents in Primary Care.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Research on Clinical Preventive Services for Adolescents and Young Adults: Where Are We and Where Do We Need to Go?The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2017
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Anne M GadomskiBassett Research Institute, Bassett Medical Center, Cooperstown, New York. Electronic address: anne.gadomski@bassett.org.
Kate E FothergillDepartment of Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
Susan LarsonDepartment of Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
Lawrence S WissowDepartment of Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
Heather WinegradDepartment of Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
Zsolt J NagykaldiDepartment of Family & Preventive Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.
Ardis L OlsonDepartment of Pediatrics, Dartmouth Medical School, Lebanon, New Hampshire.
Debra L RoterDepartment of Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.

Funding

Using Evidence-Base Care: Age Variation in Common Factors in PPCP20MH086048 · NIMH · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI WISSOW, LAWRENCE S · 2010 to 2014
$4.2M
NIMH NIH HHS P20 MH086048NIMH NIH HHS P20MH086048
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate how a comprehensive, computerized, self-administered adolescent screener, the DartScreen, affects within-visit patient-doctor interactions such as data gathering, advice giving, counseling, and discussion of mental health issues.

methodsPatient-doctor interaction was compared between visits without screening and those with the DartScreen completed before the visit. Teens, aged 15-19 years scheduled for an annual visit, were recruited at one urban and one rural pediatric primary care clinic. The doctor acted as his/her own control, first using his/her usual routine for five to six adolescent annual visits. Then, the DartScreen was introduced for five visits where at the beginning of the visit, the doctor received a summary report of the screening results. All visits were audio recorded and analyzed using the Roter interaction analysis system. Doctor and teen dialogue and topics discussed were compared between the two groups.

resultsSeven midcareer doctors and 72 adolescents participated; 37 visits without DartScreen and 35 with DartScreen were audio recorded. The Roter interaction analysis system defined medically related data gathering (mean, 36.8 vs. 32.7 statements; p = .03) and counseling (mean, 36.8 vs. 32.7 statements; p = .01) decreased with DartScreen; however, doctor responsiveness and engagement improved with DartScreen (mean, 4.8 vs. 5.1 statements; p = .00). Teens completing the DartScreen offered more psychosocial information (mean, 18.5 vs. 10.6 statements; p = .01), and mental health was discussed more after the DartScreen (mean, 93.7 vs. 43.5 statements; p = .03). Discussion of somatic and substance abuse topics did not change. Doctors reported that screening improved visit organization and efficiency.

conclusionsUse of the screener increased discussion of mental health but not at the expense of other adolescent health topics.

Indexed as

Mental HealthPhysician-Patient RelationsAdolescentAge FactorsDelivery of Health Care, IntegratedFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMass ScreeningOffice VisitsPrimary Health CareQuality ImprovementReference ValuesRural PopulationSex FactorsAdolescentMental health screeningPatient–doctor interactionsPrevisit computerized screening

Identifiers

PMID25586231
PMCPMC4339519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.