Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25586220›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2015

Insight into biases and sequencing errors for amplicon sequencing with the Illumina MiSeq platform.

Melanie Schirmer, Umer Z Ijaz, Rosalinda D'Amore, Neil Hall, William T Sloan, Christopher Quince

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 362 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
362citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

362 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. BCAR: a fast and indel-tolerant barcode-sequence mapper.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Aflatoxin BMycotoxin research · 2026
    Article
  9. Assessing Species Delimitation inMicroorganisms · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Nested PCR to optimizeMicrobiology spectrum · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

302 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Melanie SchirmerSchool of Engineering, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK mail@melanieschirmer.com.
Umer Z IjazSchool of Engineering, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Rosalinda D'AmoreFunctional and Comparative Genomics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Neil HallFunctional and Comparative Genomics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
William T SloanSchool of Engineering, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Christopher QuinceSchool of Engineering, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K002279/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With read lengths of currently up to 2 × 300 bp, high throughput and low sequencing costs Illumina's MiSeq is becoming one of the most utilized sequencing platforms worldwide. The platform is manageable and affordable even for smaller labs. This enables quick turnaround on a broad range of applications such as targeted gene sequencing, metagenomics, small genome sequencing and clinical molecular diagnostics. However, Illumina error profiles are still poorly understood and programs are therefore not designed for the idiosyncrasies of Illumina data. A better knowledge of the error patterns is essential for sequence analysis and vital if we are to draw valid conclusions. Studying true genetic variation in a population sample is fundamental for understanding diseases, evolution and origin. We conducted a large study on the error patterns for the MiSeq based on 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing data. We tested state-of-the-art library preparation methods for amplicon sequencing and showed that the library preparation method and the choice of primers are the most significant sources of bias and cause distinct error patterns. Furthermore we tested the efficiency of various error correction strategies and identified quality trimming (Sickle) combined with error correction (BayesHammer) followed by read overlapping (PANDAseq) as the most successful approach, reducing substitution error rates on average by 93%.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsBiasGene LibraryHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingINDEL MutationMetagenomicsNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSequence Analysis, DNASoftwareRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID25586220
PMCPMC4381044

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.