Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25586132›Full record

ArticleHealth promotion practice2015

Physical activity opportunities in afterschool programs.

R Glenn Weaver, Michael W Beets, Jennifer Huberty, Darcy Freedman, Gabrielle Turner-Mcgrievy, Diane Ward

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health promotion practice, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Physical activity in out of school hours care: an observational study.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2021
    Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Identifying Strategies Programs Adopt to Meet Healthy Eating and Physical Activity Standards in Afterschool Programs.Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education · 2017
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

R Glenn WeaverUniversity of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA weaverrg@mailbox.sc.edu.
Michael W BeetsUniversity of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
Jennifer HubertyArizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Darcy FreedmanUniversity of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
Gabrielle Turner-McgrievyUniversity of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
Diane WardUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

Funding

Physical Activity and Nutrition Intervention in Afterschool ProgramsR01HL112787 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI BEETS, MICHAEL W · 2012 to 2015
$2.6M
NHLBI NIH HHS HL112787NHLBI NIH HHS L40 HL120010NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL112787
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Afterschool programs (ASPs) have potential to provide children moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA). The availability and types (e.g., free play or organized activities) of physical activity opportunities, their structure (e.g., presence of lines, elimination games), and staff behaviors (e.g., encouragement, engaged) can influence children's MVPA. This study explored these factors in 20 ASPs serving over 1,700 elementary-age children. The occurrence, types, and structure of physical activity opportunities, and staff behaviors were collected via the SOSPAN (System for Observing Staff Promotion of Physical Activity and Nutrition). A total of 4,660 SOSPAN scans were completed across 63 complete program days (1,733 during physical activity opportunities). Physical activity opportunities were observed on 60 program days across all 20 sites, with 73% of those opportunities classified as free play. ASPs scheduled an average of 66.3 minutes (range 15-150 minutes) of physical activity opportunities daily. Games played included basketball, tag, soccer, and football. Staff rarely engaged in physical activity promotion behaviors, and the structure of organized games discouraged MVPA. For example, staff verbally promoted physical activity in just 6.1% of scans, while organized games were more likely to involve lines and elimination. Professional development training may enhance staffs' physical activity promotion and the structure of activity opportunities.

Indexed as

Motor ActivitySchool Health ServicesAdolescentAdultAgedChildChild, PreschoolFacultyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSouth CarolinaSportsYoung Adultobesityout-of-school timeyouth

Identifiers

PMID25586132
PMCPMC4428667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.