Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25586099›Full record

ReviewEcology letters2015

Nutritional ecology beyond the individual: a conceptual framework for integrating nutrition and social interactions.

Mathieu Lihoreau, Camille Buhl, Michael A Charleston, Gregory A Sword, David Raubenheimer, Stephen J Simpson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Ecology letters, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A neural mScience China. Life sciences · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Introduction: food processing and nutritional assimilation in animals.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. 'Hangry'Animal behaviour · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mathieu LihoreauCharles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia; School of Biological Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.
Camille Buhl
Michael A Charleston
Gregory A Sword
David Raubenheimer
Stephen J Simpson

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over recent years, modelling approaches from nutritional ecology (known as Nutritional Geometry) have been increasingly used to describe how animals and some other organisms select foods and eat them in appropriate amounts in order to maintain a balanced nutritional state maximising fitness. These nutritional strategies profoundly affect the physiology, behaviour and performance of individuals, which in turn impact their social interactions within groups and societies. Here, we present a conceptual framework to study the role of nutrition as a major ecological factor influencing the development and maintenance of social life. We first illustrate some of the mechanisms by which nutritional differences among individuals mediate social interactions in a broad range of species and ecological contexts. We then explain how studying individual- and collective-level nutrition in a common conceptual framework derived from Nutritional Geometry can bring new fundamental insights into the mechanisms and evolution of social interactions, using a combination of simulation models and manipulative experiments.

Indexed as

Animal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaEcological and Environmental PhenomenaFeeding BehaviorModels, BiologicalSocial BehaviorAnimalsBiological EvolutionComputer SimulationEcosystemCollective animal behaviourindividual-based modelsnutritional ecologynutritional geometrysocial biologysocial interactions

Identifiers

PMID25586099
PMCPMC4342766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.