Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25585620›Full record

ArticleGenetics2015

Assessing gene-environment interactions for common and rare variants with binary traits using gene-trait similarity regression.

Guolin Zhao, Rachel Marceau, Daowen Zhang, Jung-Ying Tzeng

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Gene-environment interactions in human health.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Guolin ZhaoDepartment of Statistics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695.
Rachel MarceauDepartment of Statistics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695.
Daowen ZhangDepartment of Statistics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695.
Jung-Ying TzengDepartment of Statistics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695 Bioinformatics Research Center, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695 jytzeng@stat.ncsu.edu.
North Carolina State University · US

Funding

Statistical Methods for Cancer Clinical TrialsP01CA142538 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI DAVIDIAN, MARIE, KOSOROK, MICHAEL R · 2010 to 2019
$21.3M
Flexible Statistical Methods for Biomedical DataR01CA085848 · NCI · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI DAVIDIAN, MARIE · 2000 to 2015
$3.1M
Biostatistics Training in the Omics EraT32GM081057 · NIGMS · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI MUSE, SPENCER V. · 2007 to 2019
$2.5M
Genome-wide Haplotype Association Analysis in Mental DisordersR01MH084022 · NIMH · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI TZENG, JUNG-YING · 2009 to 2011
$1.1M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA142538NCI NIH HHS R01 CA085848NCI NIH HHS R01 CA85848-12NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM081057NIGMS NIH HHS T32GM081057NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH084022Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accounting for gene-environment (G×E) interactions in complex trait association studies can facilitate our understanding of genetic heterogeneity under different environmental exposures, improve the ability to discover susceptible genes that exhibit little marginal effect, provide insight into the biological mechanisms of complex diseases, help to identify high-risk subgroups in the population, and uncover hidden heritability. However, significant G×E interactions can be difficult to find. The sample sizes required for sufficient power to detect association are much larger than those needed for genetic main effects, and interactions are sensitive to misspecification of the main-effects model. These issues are exacerbated when working with binary phenotypes and rare variants, which bear less information on association. In this work, we present a similarity-based regression method for evaluating G×E interactions for rare variants with binary traits. The proposed model aggregates the genetic and G×E information across markers, using genetic similarity, thus increasing the ability to detect G×E signals. The model has a random effects interpretation, which leads to robustness against main-effect misspecifications when evaluating G×E interactions. We construct score tests to examine G×E interactions and a computationally efficient EM algorithm to estimate the nuisance variance components. Using simulations and data applications, we show that the proposed method is a flexible and powerful tool to study the G×E effect in common or rare variant studies with binary traits.

Indexed as

Gene-Environment InteractionGene FrequencyModels, GeneticPolymorphism, GeneticAlgorithmsComputer SimulationHumansRegression Analysisbinary traitsgene–environment interactionGLMMmarker-set interaction analysisrare variant associationvariance-component methods

Identifiers

PMID25585620
PMCPMC4349065
OpenAlexW1973729826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.