Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25585543›Full record

ArticleInternational wound journal2016

The utility of the surgical safety checklist for wound patients.

Joseph W Myers, Brent A Gilmore, Kelly A Powers, Paul J Kim, Christopher E Attinger

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International wound journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Joseph W MyersDepartment of Anesthesiology, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA. Joseph.Myers@gunet.georgetown.edu.
Brent A GilmoreDepartment of Anesthesiology, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.
Kelly A PowersDepartment of Plastic Surgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.
Paul J KimDepartment of Plastic Surgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.
Christopher E AttingerDepartment of Plastic Surgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.
Georgetown University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the frequency of changes in patient care resulting from the use of a surgical safety checklist. Data were retrospectively obtained from 233 patients. The number and types of changes made to the patients' intra-operative management, based on the use of the checklist, were recorded. The number of patients whose management was modified as a result of the checklist was 113 (48%) out of 233. The total number of changes made was 132, and 18 patients had more than one modification made to their care plan. Further stratification was identified: among the 132 changes made, antibiotics were held or administered in 73 (55%), changes related to anaemia involving type and screen or transfusion occurred in 27 (20%), modifications made regarding anti-coagulation occurred in 8 (7%), beta-blockers were held in 2 (2%), an allergy was identified in 7 (5%), modifications made to the surgical procedure were 3 (2%) and a category labelled 'other' encompassed 9 (7%) changes. The surgical safety checklist is a standardised form of team communication that leads to modifications of the patient care plan in a large percentage of cases. The ever-increasing complexity of medicine means that patients are at greater risk of oversight and harm without the use of a checklist.

Indexed as

ChecklistPatient SafetyPerioperative CareCommunicationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesWounds and InjuriesChecklistClinical protocolCommunicationMedical errorsSafety

Identifiers

PMID25585543
PMCPMC7949969
OpenAlexW1587015306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.