Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25585318›Full record

ArticleJAMA2015

Exceptional opportunities in medical science: a view from the National Institutes of Health.

Francis S Collins

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. NIH funding and the pursuit of edge science.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. U.S. Physician-Scientist Workforce in the 21st Century: Recommendations to Attract and Sustain the Pipeline.Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges · 2018
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. CORRClinical orthopaedics and related research · 2017
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Participant use and communication of findings from exome sequencing: a mixed-methods study.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2016
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Clinical Perspectives on Targeting Therapies for Personalized Medicine.Advances in protein chemistry and structural biology · 2016
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Francis S CollinsNational Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

National Institutes of Health (U.S.)Research Support as TopicBiomedical ResearchBrain DiseasesCommunicable DiseasesGenomicsHumansPrecision MedicinePublic HealthStem CellsUnited States

Identifiers

PMID25585318
PMCPMC5101937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.