Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25584134›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology2014

Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics of Ingenol Mebutate 0.05% Gel Applied to Treatment Areas up to 100cm(2) on the Forearm(s) of Patients with Actinic Keratosis.

Lawrence Anderson, Michael Jarratt, George Schmieder, Stephen Shumack, Janelle Katsamas, Peter Welburn

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00659893 phase1completednot on this map

A Multi-center, Open Label, Dose-area Escalation, Cohort Study to Evaluate the Safety and Tolerability of 0.05% PEP005 Topical Gel Applied for Two Consecutive Days to Treatment Area(s) of up to a Total of 100 cm2 in Patients With Actinic Keratoses on the Extensor (Dorsal Aspect) Forearm(s)

TypeinterventionalSponsorPeplinRan2008 to 2008Enrolled64ConditionsActinic KeratosisArmsPEP005 Topical gel
NCT00852137 phase2completednot on this map

A Randomized, Double-blind, Vehicle-controlled Study to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetics of PEP005 (Ingenol Mebutate) Gel, 0.05%, When Applied in a Maximal Use Setting to the Dorsal Aspect of the Forearm in Patients With Actinic Keratosis

TypeinterventionalSponsorPeplinRan2009 to 2009Enrolled16ConditionsActinic KeratosisArmsPEP005 (ingenol mebutate) Gel, 0.05%, Vehicle Gel
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Why Is Wnt/β-Catenin Not Yet Targeted in Routine Cancer Care?Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  3. Ingenol Mebutate Induced Severe, Febrile Pustular Eruption of the Face.The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology · 2019
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lawrence AndersonDermatology Associates of Tyler, Texas;
Michael JarrattDermResearch Inc., Austin, Texas;
George SchmiederPark Avenue Dermatology, Orange Park, Florida;
Stephen ShumackUniversity of Sydney, Sydney, Australia;
Janelle KatsamasLEO Pharma Pty Ltd, Brisbane, Australia.
Peter WelburnLEO Pharma Pty Ltd, Brisbane, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine safety, tolerability, and systemic absorption of ingenol mebutate 0.05% gel applied for two consecutive days to treatment areas up to 100cm(2) on the forearm(s) of patients with actinic keratosis. DESIGN AND

settingTwo studies are reported: a Phase 1, multicenter, open-label, dose-area escalation cohort study (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00659893) and a Phase 2, double-blind, vehicle-controlled pharmacokinetic study (http://clinical trials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00852137).

participantsThe Phase 1 study included male patients (n=65), mean age 68.1 years; the Phase 2 study included both male and female patients (n=16), mean age 63.3 years. MEASUREMENTS: In the Phase 1 study, patients assigned to escalating dose-area cohorts were evaluated for local skin responses, adverse events, and any other relevant safety data. In the pharmacokinetic study, blood samples were collected pre-dose and for up to 24 hours after administration on Day 2, and analyzed for ingenol mebutate and its primary metabolites. In both studies, safety assessments were performed on Days 2, 3, 8, 15, 29, and 57 (study end).

resultsIn the Phase 1 study, most adverse events were mild, and all treatment-related adverse events resolved before the end of the study. The 100cm(2) treatment area showed a small increase in the overall intensity of mean composite local skin response scores. There was no quantifiable systemic exposure to ingenol mebutate or its primary metabolites.

conclusionIngenol mebutate 0.05% gel has a good safety profile when applied to treatment areas up to 100cm(2) with acceptable tolerability and local skin responses. There is no systemic absorption following application to areas of 100cm(2).

Identifiers

PMID25584134
PMCPMC4285446

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.