ArticleThe Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology2014
Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics of Ingenol Mebutate 0.05% Gel Applied to Treatment Areas up to 100cm(2) on the Forearm(s) of Patients with Actinic Keratosis.
Article in The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Multi-center, Open Label, Dose-area Escalation, Cohort Study to Evaluate the Safety and Tolerability of 0.05% PEP005 Topical Gel Applied for Two Consecutive Days to Treatment Area(s) of up to a Total of 100 cm2 in Patients With Actinic Keratoses on the Extensor (Dorsal Aspect) Forearm(s)
A Randomized, Double-blind, Vehicle-controlled Study to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetics of PEP005 (Ingenol Mebutate) Gel, 0.05%, When Applied in a Maximal Use Setting to the Dorsal Aspect of the Forearm in Patients With Actinic Keratosis
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- A randomized trial comparing simultaneous vs. sequential field treatment of actinic keratosis with ingenol mebutate on two separate areas of the head and body.Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2015Trial
- Why Is Wnt/β-Catenin Not Yet Targeted in Routine Cancer Care?Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Ingenol Mebutate Induced Severe, Febrile Pustular Eruption of the Face.The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology · 2019Article
- Treatment of actinic keratoses and cancerization field of the face and scalp with 0.015% ingenol mebutate gel in Brazilian individuals: safety, tolerability and patients' perspectives.Anais brasileiros de dermatologia · 2019Article
- Clinical utility of ingenol mebutate in the management of actinic keratosis: perspectives from clinical practice.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2018Review
- Cost-utility of first-line actinic keratosis treatments in Finland.Advances in therapy · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo determine safety, tolerability, and systemic absorption of ingenol mebutate 0.05% gel applied for two consecutive days to treatment areas up to 100cm(2) on the forearm(s) of patients with actinic keratosis. DESIGN AND
settingTwo studies are reported: a Phase 1, multicenter, open-label, dose-area escalation cohort study (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00659893) and a Phase 2, double-blind, vehicle-controlled pharmacokinetic study (http://clinical trials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00852137).
participantsThe Phase 1 study included male patients (n=65), mean age 68.1 years; the Phase 2 study included both male and female patients (n=16), mean age 63.3 years. MEASUREMENTS: In the Phase 1 study, patients assigned to escalating dose-area cohorts were evaluated for local skin responses, adverse events, and any other relevant safety data. In the pharmacokinetic study, blood samples were collected pre-dose and for up to 24 hours after administration on Day 2, and analyzed for ingenol mebutate and its primary metabolites. In both studies, safety assessments were performed on Days 2, 3, 8, 15, 29, and 57 (study end).
resultsIn the Phase 1 study, most adverse events were mild, and all treatment-related adverse events resolved before the end of the study. The 100cm(2) treatment area showed a small increase in the overall intensity of mean composite local skin response scores. There was no quantifiable systemic exposure to ingenol mebutate or its primary metabolites.
conclusionIngenol mebutate 0.05% gel has a good safety profile when applied to treatment areas up to 100cm(2) with acceptable tolerability and local skin responses. There is no systemic absorption following application to areas of 100cm(2).
Identifiers
25584134PMC4285446What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.