Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25584087›Full record

ArticleTranslational behavioral medicine2014

Five population-based interventions for smoking cessation: a MOST trial.

D Fraser, K Kobinsky, S S Smith, J Kramer, W E Theobald, T B Baker

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Translational behavioral medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05430529 (Development and a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of a Brief Alcohol Intervention During Smoking Cessation Treatment Delivered by Healthcare Professionals), which is not on this map. Cited by 30 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05430529 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Development and a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of a Brief Alcohol Intervention During Smoking Cessation Treatment Delivered by Healthcare Professionals

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe University of Hong KongRan2022 to 2022Enrolled100ConditionsSmoking CessationArmsStandard Smoke Cessation Service, Short Advice for Control Group, Brief Alcohol Intervention for Intervention Group
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Telephone counselling for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Print-based self-help interventions for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  3. Nicotine replacement therapy versus control for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  4. Internet-based interventions for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Mobile phone-based interventions for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Barriers to Building More Effective Treatments: Negative Interactions Amongst Smoking Intervention Components.Clinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

D FraserCenter for Tobacco Research and Intervention, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 1930 Monroe Street, Suite 200, Madison, WI 53711 USA.
K KobinskyCenter for Tobacco Research and Intervention, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 1930 Monroe Street, Suite 200, Madison, WI 53711 USA.
S S SmithCenter for Tobacco Research and Intervention, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 1930 Monroe Street, Suite 200, Madison, WI 53711 USA.
J KramerCenter for Tobacco Research and Intervention, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 1930 Monroe Street, Suite 200, Madison, WI 53711 USA.
W E TheobaldCenter for Tobacco Research and Intervention, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 1930 Monroe Street, Suite 200, Madison, WI 53711 USA.
T B BakerCenter for Tobacco Research and Intervention, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 1930 Monroe Street, Suite 200, Madison, WI 53711 USA.

Funding

Training in Translational Tobacco ScienceK05CA139871 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI BAKER, TIMOTHY B · 2008 to 2012
$850k
NCI NIH HHS K05 CA139871
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Little is known about the relative, additive, and interactive effects of different population-based treatments for smoking cessation. The goal of this study was to evaluate the main and interactive effects of five different smoking interventions. Using the multiphase optimization strategy (MOST), 1,034 smokers who entered a Web site for smokers (smokefree.gov) were randomly assigned to the "on" and "off" conditions of five smoking cessation interventions: the National Cancer Institute's (NCI) Web site (www.smokefree.gov vs a "lite" Web site), telephone quitline counseling (vs none), a smoking cessation brochure (vs a lite brochure), motivational e-mail messages (vs none), and mini-lozenge nicotine replacement therapy (NRT vs none). Analyses showed that the NCI Web site and NRT both increased abstinence; however, the former increased abstinence significantly only when it was not used with the e-mail messaging intervention (messaging decreased Web site use). The other interventions showed little evidence of effectiveness. There was evidence that mailed nicotine mini-lozenges and the NCI Web site (www.smokefree.gov) provide benefit as population-based smoking interventions.

Indexed as

MOST researchNicotine replacementSmoking cessationTelephone quitlineWeb site evaluation

Identifiers

PMID25584087
PMCPMC4286555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.