Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25583923›Full record

ArticlePlant physiology2015

Does low stomatal conductance or photosynthetic capacity enhance growth at elevated CO2 in Arabidopsis?

Hsien Ming Easlon, Eli Carlisle, John K McKay, Arnold J Bloom

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant physiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. COPlanta · 2019
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hsien Ming EaslonDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, California 95616 (H.M.E., E.C., A.J.B.); andDepartment of Bioagricultural Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523 (J.K.M.) heaslon@ucdavis.edu.
Eli CarlisleDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, California 95616 (H.M.E., E.C., A.J.B.); andDepartment of Bioagricultural Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523 (J.K.M.).
John K McKayDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, California 95616 (H.M.E., E.C., A.J.B.); andDepartment of Bioagricultural Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523 (J.K.M.).
Arnold J BloomDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, California 95616 (H.M.E., E.C., A.J.B.); andDepartment of Bioagricultural Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523 (J.K.M.).
University of California, Davis · USColorado State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine if low stomatal conductance (g) increases growth, nitrate (NO3 (-)) assimilation, and nitrogen (N) utilization at elevated CO2 concentration. Four Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) near isogenic lines (NILs) differing in g were grown at ambient and elevated CO2 concentration under low and high NO3 (-) supply as the sole source of N. Although g varied by 32% among NILs at elevated CO2, leaf intercellular CO2 concentration varied by only 4% and genotype had no effect on shoot NO3 (-) concentration in any treatment. Low-g NILs showed the greatest CO2 growth increase under N limitation but had the lowest CO2 growth enhancement under N-sufficient conditions. NILs with the highest and lowest g had similar rates of shoot NO3 (-) assimilation following N deprivation at elevated CO2 concentration. After 5 d of N deprivation, the lowest g NIL had 27% lower maximum carboxylation rate and 23% lower photosynthetic electron transport compared with the highest g NIL. These results suggest that increased growth of low-g NILs under N limitation most likely resulted from more conservative N investment in photosynthetic biochemistry rather than from low g.

Indexed as

ArabidopsisBiomassCarbon DioxideCarbon IsotopesNitratesNitrogenPhotosynthesisPlant RootsPlant ShootsPlant StomataCarbon DioxideCarbon IsotopesNitratesNitrogen

Identifiers

PMID25583923
PMCPMC4348751
OpenAlexW1963903226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.