Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25583714›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2015

Multicenter evaluation of MIC distributions for epidemiologic cutoff value definition to detect amphotericin B, posaconazole, and itraconazole resistance among the most clinically relevant species of Mucorales.

A Espinel-Ingroff, A Chakrabarti, A Chowdhary, S Cordoba, E Dannaoui, P Dufresne, A Fothergill, M Ghannoum, G M Gonzalez, J Guarro and 6 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Infective Esophagitis.The Korean journal of helicobacter and upper gastrointestinal research · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. TheIranian journal of pathology · 2025
    Article
  10. A Comprehensive Analysis of the Lipidomic Signatures inJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  11. Pre and Post Covid - 19 Experience of the 'Amphotericin Sandwich' Therapy in the Management of Mucormycosis.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Molecular mechanisms that govern infection and antifungal resistance in Mucorales.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. IntegratingCurrent research in microbial sciences · 2024
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. What Is New in Pulmonary Mucormycosis?Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

A Espinel-IngroffVCU Medical Center, Richmond, Virginia, USA avingrof@vcu.edu.
A ChakrabartiDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
A ChowdharyVallabhbhai Patel Chest Institute, University of Delhi, Delhi, India.
S CordobaInstituto Nacional de Enfermedades Infecciosas Dr. C. G. Malbrán, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
E DannaouiUniversité Paris-Descartes, Faculté de Médecine, APHP, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Unité de Parasitologie-Mycologie, Service de Microbiologie, Paris, France.
P DufresneInstitut National de Santé Publique du Québec, Laboratoire de Santé Publique du Québec, Sainte-Anne-de-Bellevue, Québec, Canada.
A FothergillUniversity of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, Texas, USA.
M GhannoumUniversity Hospitals Case Medical Center and Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
G M GonzalezUniversidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Monterrey, Nuevo León, México.
J GuarroFacultat de Medicina, IISPV, URV, Reus, Spain.
S KiddNational Mycology Reference Centre, SA Pathology, Adelaide, Australia.
C Lass-FlörlThe Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria.
J F MeisDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital and Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
T PelaezHospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, School of Medicine-Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain.
A M TortoranoDepartment of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
J TurnidgeUniversity of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical breakpoints (CBPs) have not been established for the Mucorales and any antifungal agent. In lieu of CBPs, epidemiologic cutoff values (ECVs) are proposed for amphotericin B, posaconazole, and itraconazole and four Mucorales species. Wild-type (WT) MIC distributions (organisms in a species-drug combination with no detectable acquired resistance mechanisms) were defined with available pooled CLSI MICs from 14 laboratories (Argentina, Australia, Canada, Europe, India, Mexico, and the United States) as follows: 10 Apophysomyces variabilis, 32 Cunninghamella bertholletiae, 136 Lichtheimia corymbifera, 10 Mucor indicus, 123 M. circinelloides, 19 M. ramosissimus, 349 Rhizopus arrhizus, 146 R. microsporus, 33 Rhizomucor pusillus, and 36 Syncephalastrum racemosum isolates. CLSI broth microdilution MICs were aggregated for the analyses. ECVs comprising ≥95% and ≥97.5% of the modeled populations were as follows: amphotericin B ECVs for L. corymbifera were 1 and 2 μg/ml, those for M. circinelloides were 1 and 2 μg/ml, those for R. arrhizus were 2 and 4 μg/ml, and those for R. microsporus were 2 and 2 μg/ml, respectively; posaconazole ECVs for L. corymbifera were 1 and 2, those for M. circinelloides were 4 and 4, those for R. arrhizus were 1 and 2, and those for R. microsporus were 1 and 2, respectively; both itraconazole ECVs for R. arrhizus were 2 μg/ml. ECVs may aid in detecting emerging resistance or isolates with reduced susceptibility (non-WT MICs) to the agents evaluated.

Indexed as

Amphotericin BAntifungal AgentsDrug Resistance, Multiple, FungalHumansItraconazoleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMucoralesMucormycosisTriazolesAmphotericin BAntifungal AgentsItraconazoleposaconazoleTriazoles

Identifiers

PMID25583714
PMCPMC4325796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.