ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2015
Integrative analysis of sequencing and array genotype data for discovering disease associations with rare mutations.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Meta-analysis for Discovering Rare-Variant Associations: Statistical Methods and Software Programs.American journal of human genetics · 2015Pooled it
- Adjustment for Genotype Imputation Uncertainty Corrects for Inflated Type I Error in Family-Based Association Testing.Genetic epidemiology · 2025Article
- Two-phase sample selection strategies for design and analysis in post-genome-wide association fine-mapping studies.Statistics in medicine · 2021Article
- Sequencing and imputation in GWAS: Cost-effective strategies to increase power and genomic coverage across diverse populations.Genetic epidemiology · 2020Article
- Analysis in case-control sequencing association studies with different sequencing depths.Biostatistics (Oxford, England) · 2020Article
- Genomics of periodontal disease and tooth morbidity.Periodontology 2000 · 2020Review
- Robust Score Tests With Missing Data in Genomics Studies.Journal of the American Statistical Association · 2019Article
- Protocols, Methods, and Tools for Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS) of Dental Traits.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2019Article
- Estimation of kinship coefficient in structured and admixed populations using sparse sequencing data.PLoS genetics · 2017Article
- Elucidation of the complex metabolic profile of cerebrospinal fluid using an untargeted biochemical profiling assay.Molecular genetics and metabolism · 2017Article
- The Genomics of Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2017Review
- An integrative approach to investigate the respective roles of single-nucleotide variants and copy-number variants in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.Scientific reports · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In the large cohorts that have been used for genome-wide association studies (GWAS), it is prohibitively expensive to sequence all cohort members. A cost-effective strategy is to sequence subjects with extreme values of quantitative traits or those with specific diseases. By imputing the sequencing data from the GWAS data for the cohort members who are not selected for sequencing, one can dramatically increase the number of subjects with information on rare variants. However, ignoring the uncertainties of imputed rare variants in downstream association analysis will inflate the type I error when sequenced subjects are not a random subset of the GWAS subjects. In this article, we provide a valid and efficient approach to combining observed and imputed data on rare variants. We consider commonly used gene-level association tests, all of which are constructed from the score statistic for assessing the effects of individual variants on the trait of interest. We show that the score statistic based on the observed genotypes for sequenced subjects and the imputed genotypes for nonsequenced subjects is unbiased. We derive a robust variance estimator that reflects the true variability of the score statistic regardless of the sampling scheme and imputation quality, such that the corresponding association tests always have correct type I error. We demonstrate through extensive simulation studies that the proposed tests are substantially more powerful than the use of accurately imputed variants only and the use of sequencing data alone. We provide an application to the Women's Health Initiative. The relevant software is freely available.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.