Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25583125›Full record

ArticleCritical care (London, England)2015

Adjusting tidal volume to stress index in an open lung condition optimizes ventilation and prevents overdistension in an experimental model of lung injury and reduced chest wall compliance.

Carlos Ferrando, Fernando Suárez-Sipmann, Andrea Gutierrez, Gerardo Tusman, Jose Carbonell, Marisa García, Laura Piqueras, Desamparados Compañ, Susanie Flores, Marina Soro and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care (London, England), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Non-invasive over-distension measurements: data driven vs model-based.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Carlos FerrandoAnesthesiology and Critical Care Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario of Valencia, Av. Blasco Ibañez, 17, Valencia, CP: 46010, Spain. cafeoranestesia@gmail.com.
Fernando Suárez-SipmannSection of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Uppsala University Hospital Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden. fsuarezsipmann@gmail.com.
Andrea GutierrezAnesthesiology and Critical Care Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario of Valencia, Av. Blasco Ibañez, 17, Valencia, CP: 46010, Spain. andreguti@hotmail.com.
Gerardo TusmanDepartment of Anesthesiology, Hospital Privado de Comunidad, Mar de Plata, Argentina. gtusman@hotmail.com.
Jose CarbonellAnesthesiology and Critical Care Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario of Valencia, Av. Blasco Ibañez, 17, Valencia, CP: 46010, Spain. joseacarbonell19@hotmail.com.
Marisa GarcíaAnesthesiology and Critical Care Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario of Valencia, Av. Blasco Ibañez, 17, Valencia, CP: 46010, Spain. marisagarciap@gmail.com.
Laura PiquerasClinical Research Foundation, Hospital Clínico Universitario of Valencia, Valencia, Spain. lpiqueras70@hotmail.com.
Desamparados CompañPathological Anatomy Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario of Valencia, Valencia, Spain. company_amp@gva.es.
Susanie FloresRadiology Department, Hospital Clinico Universitario of Valencia, Valencia, Spain. susaniefc@gmail.com.
Marina SoroAnesthesiology and Critical Care Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario of Valencia, Av. Blasco Ibañez, 17, Valencia, CP: 46010, Spain. soromarina@gmail.com.
Alicia LlombartClinical Research Foundation, Hospital Clínico Universitario of Valencia, Valencia, Spain. allombart@incliva.es.
Francisco Javier BeldaAnesthesiology and Critical Care Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario of Valencia, Av. Blasco Ibañez, 17, Valencia, CP: 46010, Spain. fco.javier.belda@uv.es.
Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia · ESHospital Privado de Comunidad · ARUppsala University Hospital · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe stress index (SI), a parameter derived from the shape of the pressure-time curve, can identify injurious mechanical ventilation. We tested the hypothesis that adjusting tidal volume (VT) to a non-injurious SI in an open lung condition avoids hypoventilation while preventing overdistension in an experimental model of combined lung injury and low chest-wall compliance (Ccw).

methodsLung injury was induced by repeated lung lavages using warm saline solution, and Ccw was reduced by controlled intra-abdominal air-insufflation in 22 anesthetized, paralyzed and mechanically ventilated pigs. After injury animals were recruited and submitted to a positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) titration trial to find the PEEP level resulting in maximum compliance. During a subsequent four hours of mechanical ventilation, VT was adjusted to keep a plateau pressure (Pplat) of 30 cmH2O (Pplat-group, n = 11) or to a SI between 0.95 and 1.05 (SI-group, n = 11). Respiratory rate was adjusted to maintain a 'normal' PaCO2 (35 to 65 mmHg). SI, lung mechanics, arterial-blood gases haemodynamics pro-inflammatory cytokines and histopathology were analyzed. In addition Computed Tomography (CT) data were acquired at end expiration and end inspiration in six animals.

resultsPaCO2 was significantly higher in the Pplat-group (82 versus 53 mmHg, P = 0.01), with a resulting lower pH (7.19 versus 7.34, P = 0.01). We observed significant differences in VT (7.3 versus 5.4 mlKg(-1), P = 0.002) and Pplat values (30 versus 35 cmH2O, P = 0.001) between the Pplat-group and SI-group respectively. SI (1.03 versus 0.99, P = 0.42) and end-inspiratory transpulmonary pressure (PTP) (17 versus 18 cmH2O, P = 0.42) were similar in the Pplat- and SI-groups respectively, without differences in overinflated lung areas at end- inspiration in both groups. Cytokines and histopathology showed no differences.

conclusionsSetting tidal volume to a non-injurious stress index in an open lung condition improves alveolar ventilation and prevents overdistension without increasing lung injury. This is in comparison with limited Pplat protective ventilation in a model of lung injury with low chest-wall compliance.

Indexed as

Tidal VolumeAnimalsBronchoalveolar LavageDisease Models, AnimalHemodynamicsLung InjuryPositive-Pressure RespirationSwineThoracic Wall

Identifiers

PMID25583125
PMCPMC4352239
OpenAlexW2023521894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.