Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25582954›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2015

No DNA damage response and negligible genome-wide transcriptional changes in human embryonic stem cells exposed to terahertz radiation.

A N Bogomazova, E M Vassina, T N Goryachkovskaya, V M Popik, A S Sokolov, N A Kolchanov, M A Lagarkova, S L Kiselev, S E Peltek

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Specific Features of the Proteomic Response of Thermophilic BacteriumInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Cellular effects of terahertz waves.Journal of biomedical optics · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

A N Bogomazova1] Vavilov Institute of General Genetics RAS, Moscow, Russia [2] Skoltech Center for Stem Cell Research, Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Skolkovo, Moscow Region, Russia.
E M Vassina1] Vavilov Institute of General Genetics RAS, Moscow, Russia [2] Skoltech Center for Stem Cell Research, Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Skolkovo, Moscow Region, Russia.
T N GoryachkovskayaInstitute of Cytology and Genetics RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia.
V M PopikBudker Institute of Nucleic Physics SB RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia.
A S SokolovCentre "Bioengineering" RAS, Moscow, Russia.
N A KolchanovInstitute of Cytology and Genetics RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia.
M A Lagarkova1] Vavilov Institute of General Genetics RAS, Moscow, Russia [2] Scientific Research Institute of Physical-Chemical Medicine, Moscow, Russia [3] Skoltech Center for Stem Cell Research, Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Skolkovo, Moscow Region, Russia.
S L Kiselev1] Vavilov Institute of General Genetics RAS, Moscow, Russia [2] Skoltech Center for Stem Cell Research, Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Skolkovo, Moscow Region, Russia.
S E PeltekInstitute of Cytology and Genetics RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Institute of Cytology and Genetics · RUVavilov Institute of General Genetics · RUBioengineering Center · RUFederal Research and Clinical Center of Physical-Chemical Medicine named after Y.M. Lopukhin · RUSiberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Terahertz (THz) radiation was proposed recently for use in various applications, including medical imaging and security scanners. However, there are concerns regarding the possible biological effects of non-ionising electromagnetic radiation in the THz range on cells. Human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) are extremely sensitive to environmental stimuli, and we therefore utilised this cell model to investigate the non-thermal effects of THz irradiation. We studied DNA damage and transcriptome responses in hESCs exposed to narrow-band THz radiation (2.3 THz) under strict temperature control. The transcription of approximately 1% of genes was subtly increased following THz irradiation. Functional annotation enrichment analysis of differentially expressed genes revealed 15 functional classes, which were mostly related to mitochondria. Terahertz irradiation did not induce the formation of γH2AX foci or structural chromosomal aberrations in hESCs. We did not observe any effect on the mitotic index or morphology of the hESCs following THz exposure.

Indexed as

Genome, HumanTerahertz RadiationCell LineCell NucleusCell ShapeChromosome AberrationsCluster AnalysisCyclin B1Cytogenetic AnalysisDNA Breaks, Double-StrandedDNA DamageEmbryonic Stem CellsG1 PhaseHistonesHumansIndolesCyclin B1DAPIH2AX protein, humanHistonesIndoles

Identifiers

PMID25582954
PMCPMC4291560
OpenAlexW2002523209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.