Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25582886›Full record

ArticleAddiction biology2015

Persistent palatable food preference in rats with a history of limited and extended access to methamphetamine self-administration.

Daniele Caprioli, Tamara Zeric, Eric B Thorndike, Marco Venniro

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Addiction biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Generalized cue reactivity in dopamine neurons after opioids.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Role of Piriform Cortex and Its Afferent Projections in Relapse to Fentanyl Seeking after Food Choice-Induced Voluntary Abstinence.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Daniele CaprioliBehavioral Neuroscience Research Branch, Intramural Research Program, NIH, DHHS, National Institute on Drug Abuse, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Tamara ZericBehavioral Neuroscience Research Branch, Intramural Research Program, NIH, DHHS, National Institute on Drug Abuse, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Eric B ThorndikeBehavioral Neuroscience Research Branch, Intramural Research Program, NIH, DHHS, National Institute on Drug Abuse, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Marco VenniroBehavioral Neuroscience Research Branch, Intramural Research Program, NIH, DHHS, National Institute on Drug Abuse, Baltimore, MD, USA.
National Institute on Drug Abuse · US

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS Z99 DA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent studies have shown that when given a mutually exclusive choice between cocaine and palatable foods, most rats prefer the non-drug rewards over cocaine. Here, we used a discrete choice procedure to assess whether palatable food preference generalizes to rats with a history of limited (3 hours/day) or extended (6 or 9 hours/day) access to methamphetamine self-administration. On different daily sessions, we trained rats to lever-press for either methamphetamine (0.1-0.2 mg/kg/infusion) or palatable food (five pellets per reward delivery) for several weeks; regular food was freely available. We then assessed food-methamphetamine preference either during training, after priming methamphetamine injections (0.5-1.0 mg/kg), following a satiety manipulation (palatable food exposure in the home cage) or after 21 days of withdrawal from methamphetamine. We also assessed progressive ratio responding for palatable food and methamphetamine. We found that independent of the daily drug access conditions and the withdrawal period, the rats strongly preferred the palatable food over methamphetamine, even when they were given free access to the palatable food in the home cage. Intake of methamphetamine and progressive ratio responding for the drug, both of which increased or escalated over time, did not predict preference in the discrete choice test. Results demonstrate that most rats strongly prefer palatable food pellets over intravenous methamphetamine, confirming previous studies using discrete choice procedures with intravenous cocaine. Results also demonstrate that escalation of drug self-administration, a popular model of compulsive drug use, is not associated with a cardinal feature of human addiction of reduced behavioral responding for non-drug rewards.

Indexed as

AnimalsBehavior, AddictiveBehavior, AnimalCentral Nervous System StimulantsChoice BehaviorConditioning, OperantDisease Models, AnimalFood PreferencesMaleMethamphetamineRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyRewardSelf AdministrationCentral Nervous System StimulantsMethamphetamineDiscrete choicedrug primingextended accessfood satietylimited accesspalatable foodpreferenceprogressive ratiopsychostimulantsself-administration

Identifiers

PMID25582886
PMCPMC4499505
OpenAlexW1941428045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.