Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25582774›Full record

ArticleBiochemical and biophysical research communications2015

Differential effects of estrogen-dependent transactivation vs. transrepression by the estrogen receptor on invasiveness of HER2 overexpressing breast cancer cells.

Mugdha Patki, Marcela d'alincourt Salazar, Robert Trumbly, Manohar Ratnam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biochemical and biophysical research communications, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mugdha PatkiDepartment of Oncology, Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute, 4100 John R., Detroit, MI 48201, USA; Department of Biochemistry and Cancer Biology, University Medical Center, Toledo, OH 43614, USA.
Marcela d'alincourt SalazarDepartment of Biochemistry and Cancer Biology, University Medical Center, Toledo, OH 43614, USA; Division of Translational Research, Beckman Research Institute, City of Hope, Duarte, CA 91010, USA.
Robert TrumblyDepartment of Biochemistry and Cancer Biology, University Medical Center, Toledo, OH 43614, USA.
Manohar RatnamDepartment of Oncology, Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute, 4100 John R., Detroit, MI 48201, USA. Electronic address: ratnamm@karmanos.org.
University of Toledo Medical Center · USThe Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute · US

Funding

Dissecting the Mechanisms of Tamoxifen ActionR01CA140690 · NCI · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI RATNAM, MANOHAR · 2009 to 2013
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS 5R01CA140690NCI NIH HHS R01 CA140690
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Estrogen (E2) supports breast cancer cell growth but suppresses invasiveness and both actions are antagonized by anti-estrogens. As a consequence, anti-estrogen treatment may increase the invasive potential of estrogen receptor (ER)+ tumor cell sub-populations that are endocrine resistant due to HER2 amplification. Either transactivation or transrepression by E2/ER could lead to both up- and down-regulation of many genes. Inhibition of the transactivation function of ER is adequate to inhibit E2-dependent growth. However, the impact of inhibiting E2-dependent transactivation vs. transrepression by ER on regulation of invasiveness by E2 is less clear. Here we dissect the roles of ER-mediated transactivation and transrepression in the regulation of invasiveness of ER+/HER2+ breast cancer cells by E2. Knocking down the general ER co-activators CBP and p300 prevented activation by E2 of its classical target genes but did not interfere with the ability of E2 to repress its direct target genes known to support invasiveness and tumor progression; there was also no effect on invasiveness or the ability of E2 to regulate invasiveness. On the other hand, overexpression of a co-repressor binding site mutant of ER (L372R) prevented E2-dependent transrepression but not transactivation. The mutant ER abrogated the ability of E2 to suppress invasiveness. E2 can partially down-regulate HER2 but knocking down HER2 below E2-regulated levels did not affect invasiveness or the ability of E2 to regulate invasiveness, although it did inhibit growth. Therefore, in ER+/HER2+ cells, the E2-dependent transrepression by ER rather than its transactivation function is critical for regulation of invasiveness and this is independent of HER2 regulation by E2. The findings suggest that selective inhibitors of transactivation by ER may be more beneficial in reducing tumor progression than conventional anti-estrogens that also antagonize E2-dependent transrepression.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesEstradiolEstrogen Receptor alphaEstrogen Receptor ModulatorsEstrogensFemaleGene ExpressionHumansNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasms, Hormone-DependentTranscriptional ActivationERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesESR1 protein, humanEstradiolEstrogen Receptor alphaEstrogen Receptor ModulatorsEstrogensAnti-estrogensBreast cancerEstrogen receptorHER2InvasivenessTamoxifen

Identifiers

PMID25582774
PMCPMC4334377
OpenAlexW1986237959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.