Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25582739›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2015

Surgical Referral for Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Population-Based Survey.

Robert W Krell, Bradley N Reames, Samantha Hendren, Timothy L Frankel, Timothy M Pawlik, Mathew Chung, David Kwon, Sandra L Wong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Surgical Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastases: Attitudes and Practice Patterns in the Deep South.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2022
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Proclivity to Explore Locally Advanced Pancreas Cancer Is Not Associated with Surgeon Volume.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Robert W KrellDepartment of Surgery, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Bradley N Reames
Samantha Hendren
Timothy L Frankel
Timothy M Pawlik
Mathew Chung
David Kwon
Sandra L Wong

Funding

University of Michigan Surgical Oncology Research Training ProgramT32CA009672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI JACQUELINE SARA JERUSS, WEIPING ZOU · 1991 to 2026
$6.0M
Improving Rectal Cancer Surgery Through Regional CollaborationK07CA163665 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI HENDREN, SAMANTHA KATHLEEN · 2012 to 2015
$700k
Understanding variation in treatment intensity of poor prognosis cancersK08HS020937 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI WONG, SANDRA L · 2012 to 2015
$537k
AHRQ HHS 1K08HS20937-01AHRQ HHS K08 HS020937NCI NIH HHS 1K07CA163665-22NCI NIH HHS 5T32CA009672-22NCI NIH HHS K07 CA163665NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSurgical resection is underutilized for patients with colorectal liver metastases (CLM). Although the causes of underutilization are poorly understood, provider attitudes towards surgical referral may be contributory. We sought to understand medical oncologists' perspectives on referral for CLM.

methodsMedical oncologists who treat colorectal cancer in the US state of Michigan were surveyed. We characterized respondents' attitudes regarding clinical and tumor-related contraindications to liver resection for CLM, as well as referral and treatment preferences using case-based scenarios. We then evaluated practice characteristics and treatment preferences between physicians.

resultsA total of 112 eligible responses were received (46 % response rate). Nearly 40 % of respondents reported having no liver surgeons in their practice area. Commonly perceived contraindications to liver resection included extrahepatic disease (80.3 %), poor performance status (77.7 %), the presence of >4 metastases (62.5 %), bilobar metastases (43.8 %), and metastasis size >5 cm (40.2 %). Compared with high-referring physicians, low-referring physicians were just as likely to refer a patient with very low recurrence risk (89.3 vs. 98.3 %; p = 0.099), but much less likely to refer a patient with moderate risk (0 vs. 82.8 %; p < 0.001). High-referring physicians were more likely to consider resection for scenarios consistent with higher recurrence risk (31.0 vs. 10.7 %; p = 0.05).

conclusionsWe found wide variation in surgical referral patterns for CLM. Many felt that bilobar disease and tumor size were contraindications to liver-directed therapy despite a lack of supporting data. These findings suggest an urgent need to increase dissemination of evidence and guidance regarding management for CLM, perhaps through increased specialist participation in tumor boards.

Indexed as

HepatectomyColorectal NeoplasmsHumansLiver NeoplasmsMichiganNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingPatient Care TeamPractice Guidelines as TopicPractice Patterns, Physicians'PrognosisReferral and ConsultationSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID25582739
PMCPMC4631547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.