Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25582580›Full record

ArticleBrain : a journal of neurology2015

Human spinal locomotor control is based on flexibly organized burst generators.

Simon M Danner, Ursula S Hofstoetter, Brigitta Freundl, Heinrich Binder, Winfried Mayr, Frank Rattay, Karen Minassian

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain : a journal of neurology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04807764 (Priming With High-Frequency Trans-spinal Stimulation to Augment Locomotor Benefits in Spinal Cord Injury), which is not on this map. Cited by 83 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
83citing papers in PubMed
13.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04807764 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Priming With High-Frequency Trans-spinal Stimulation to Augment Locomotor Benefits in Spinal Cord Injury

TypeinterventionalSponsorCity University of New YorkRan2021 to 2024Enrolled14ConditionsSpinal Cord Injuries, Paraplegia, Spinal, Tetraplegia/Tetraparesis, Paraplegia, SpasticArmsStanding transspinal stimulation followed by robotic gait training, Lying transspinal stimulation followed by robotic gait training, Standing sham transspinal stimulation followed by robotic gait training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

83 citing papers in PubMed, 179 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

23 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Simon M Danner1 Institute for Analysis and Scientific Computing, Vienna University of Technology, Vienna, Austria 2 Centre for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Ursula S Hofstoetter2 Centre for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Brigitta Freundl3 Neurological Centre, Otto Wagner Hospital, Vienna, Austria.
Heinrich Binder3 Neurological Centre, Otto Wagner Hospital, Vienna, Austria.
Winfried Mayr2 Centre for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Frank Rattay1 Institute for Analysis and Scientific Computing, Vienna University of Technology, Vienna, Austria.
Karen Minassian2 Centre for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria karen.minassian@gmail.com.
Medical University of Vienna · ATOtto Wagner Hospital · ATTU Wien · AT

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF L 512
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Constant drive provided to the human lumbar spinal cord by epidural electrical stimulation can cause local neural circuits to generate rhythmic motor outputs to lower limb muscles in people paralysed by spinal cord injury. Epidural spinal cord stimulation thus allows the study of spinal rhythm and pattern generating circuits without their configuration by volitional motor tasks or task-specific peripheral feedback. To reveal spinal locomotor control principles, we studied the repertoire of rhythmic patterns that can be generated by the functionally isolated human lumbar spinal cord, detected as electromyographic activity from the legs, and investigated basic temporal components shared across these patterns. Ten subjects with chronic, motor-complete spinal cord injury were studied. Surface electromyographic responses to lumbar spinal cord stimulation were collected from quadriceps, hamstrings, tibialis anterior, and triceps surae in the supine position. From these data, 10-s segments of rhythmic activity present in the four muscle groups of one limb were extracted. Such samples were found in seven subjects. Physiologically adequate cycle durations and relative extension- and flexion-phase durations similar to those needed for locomotion were generated. The multi-muscle activation patterns exhibited a variety of coactivation, mixed-synergy and locomotor-like configurations. Statistical decomposition of the electromyographic data across subjects, muscles and samples of rhythmic patterns identified three common temporal components, i.e. basic or shared activation patterns. Two of these basic patterns controlled muscles to contract either synchronously or alternatingly during extension- and flexion-like phases. The third basic pattern contributed to the observed muscle activities independently from these extensor- and flexor-related basic patterns. Each bifunctional muscle group was able to express both extensor- and flexor-patterns, with variable ratios across the samples of rhythmic patterns. The basic activation patterns can be interpreted as central drives implemented by spinal burst generators that impose specific spatiotemporally organized activation on the lumbosacral motor neuron pools. Our data thus imply that the human lumbar spinal cord circuits can form burst-generating elements that flexibly combine to obtain a wide range of locomotor outputs from a constant, repetitive input. It may be possible to use this flexibility to incorporate specific adaptations to gait and stance to improve locomotor control, even after severe central nervous system damage.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultBiophysicsChi-Square DistributionElectric StimulationElectromyographyEvoked Potentials, MotorFemaleFunctional LateralityHumansMaleMiddle AgedMovement DisordersMuscle, SkeletalPeriodicitySpinal Cordcentral pattern generationepidural spinal cord stimulationhumanmodular organizationspinal cord injury

Identifiers

PMID25582580
PMCPMC4408427
OpenAlexW2120815846

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.