Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25582499›Full record

ArticleHuman pathology2015

Undifferentiated carcinoma of the esophagus: a clinicopathological study of 16 cases.

Aatur D Singhi, Raja R Seethala, Katie Nason, Tyler J Foxwell, Robyn L Roche, Kevin M McGrath, Ryan M Levy, James D Luketich, Jon M Davison

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human pathology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Gastrointestinal tract, its pathophysiology andWorld journal of gastroenterology · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Functional and clinical significance of SALL4 in breast cancer.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2016
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Aatur D SinghiDepartment of Pathology, the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15213. Electronic address: singhiad@upmc.edu.
Raja R SeethalaDepartment of Pathology, the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15213.
Katie NasonDepartment of Surgery, the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15213.
Tyler J FoxwellDepartment of Pathology, the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15213.
Robyn L RocheDepartment of Pathology, the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15213.
Kevin M McGrathDepartment of Medicine, the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15213.
Ryan M LevyDepartment of Surgery, the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15213.
James D LuketichDepartment of Surgery, the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15213.
Jon M DavisonDepartment of Pathology, the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15213.
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center · USUPMC Health System · US

Funding

Barriers to Early Detection of Esophageal AdenocarcinomaK07CA151613 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI NASON, KATIE S · 2011 to 2015
$818k
NCI NIH HHS K07 CA151613
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Undifferentiated carcinoma of the esophagus is a rare histologic variant of esophageal carcinoma. Using criteria based on studies of undifferentiated carcinomas arising at other sites, we have collected 16 cases of resected esophageal undifferentiated carcinomas. Patients ranged in age from 39 to 84 years (mean, 65.5 years) and were predominantly male (94%). The tumors were characterized by an expansile growth pattern of neoplastic cells organized in solid sheets and without significant glandular, squamous, or neuroendocrine differentiation. The neoplastic cells had a syncytial-like appearance, little intervening stroma, and patchy tumor necrosis. In a subset of cases, the tumor cells adopted a sarcomatoid (n = 2), rhabdoid (n = 1), or minor component (<5%) of glandular morphology (n = 3). In 1 case, reactive osteoclast-like giant cells were found interspersed among the neoplastic cells. Lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, and lymph node metastases were identified in 88%, 56%, and 81% of cases, respectively. In 12 (75%) specimens, the background esophageal mucosa was notable for Barrett esophagus. Consistent with the epithelial nature of these neoplasms, cytokeratin positivity was identified in all cases. In addition, SALL4 expression was present in 8 (67%) of 12 cases. Follow-up information was available for 15 (94%) of 16 patients, all of whom were deceased. Survival after surgery ranged from 1 to 50 months (mean, 11.9 months). Before death, 67% patients had documented locoregional recurrence and/or distant organ metastases. In summary, esophageal undifferentiated carcinomas are aggressive neoplasms and associated with a high incidence of recurrence and/or metastases and a dismal prognosis.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAlcohol DrinkingAnemiaBarrett EsophagusBiomarkers, TumorCarcinomaCarcinoma, Squamous CellComorbidityDeglutition DisordersEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophageal Squamous Cell CarcinomaFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGastroesophageal RefluxBiomarkers, TumorKeratinsSALL4 protein, humanTranscription FactorsCarcinomaEsophagogastricEsophagusGastroesophagealSALL4Undifferentiated

Identifiers

PMID25582499
PMCPMC4384179
OpenAlexW2162067463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.