Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25582459›Full record

ArticleActa orthopaedica2015

Risk of atypical femoral fracture during and after bisphosphonate use.

Jörg Schilcher, Veronika Koeppen, Per Aspenberg, Karl Michaëlsson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta orthopaedica, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 96 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
96citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

96 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Fracture risk following intermission of osteoporosis therapy.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2019
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Manual chart review reveals bisphosphonate exposure misclassification in atypical femur fracture patients: auditing medical records in two international cohorts.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

36 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jörg SchilcherOrthopedics Section, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine , Faculty of Health Sciences, Linköping University , Linköping.
Veronika Koeppen
Per Aspenberg
Karl Michaëlsson

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeUse of bisphosphonates in women is associated with higher risk of atypical femoral fractures. The risk in terms of timing of use and type of bisphosphonate, and in men, remains unclear. PATIENTS AND

methodsWe reviewed radiographs of 5,342 Swedish women and men aged 55 years or more who had had a fracture of the femoral shaft in the 3-year period 2008-2010 (97% of those eligible), and found 172 patients with atypical fractures (93% of them women). We obtained data on medication and comorbidity. The risk of atypical fracture associated with bisphosphonate use was estimated in a nationwide cohort analysis. In addition, we performed a case-control analysis with comparison to 952 patients with ordinary shaft fractures. A short report of the findings has recently been presented (Schilcher et al. 2014a). Here we provide full details.

resultsThe age-adjusted relative risk (RR) of atypical fracture associated with bisphosphonate use was 55 (95% CI: 39-79) in women and 54 (CI: 15-192) in men. In bisphosphonate users, women had a 3-fold higher risk than men (RR = 3.1, CI: 1.1-8.4). Alendronate users had higher risk than risedronate users (RR = 1.9, CI: 1.1-3.3). The RR after 4 years or more of use reached 126 (CI: 55-288), with a corresponding absolute risk of 11 (CI: 7-14) fractures per 10,000 person-years of use. The risk decreased by 70% per year since last use.

interpretationWomen have a higher risk of atypical femoral fracture than men. The type of bisphosphonate used may affect risk estimates and the risk decreases rapidly after cessation.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAlendronateBone Density Conservation AgentsCase-Control StudiesCohort StudiesDiphosphonatesEtidronic AcidFemaleFemoral FracturesHumansMaleMiddle AgedOsteoporotic FracturesRadiographyRetrospective StudiesAlendronateBone Density Conservation AgentsDiphosphonatesEtidronic AcidRisedronic Acid

Identifiers

PMID25582459
PMCPMC4366670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.