Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25582341›Full record

ReviewImmunology and cell biology2015

Regulation of CD4 T-cell differentiation and inflammation by repressive histone methylation.

Frann Antignano, Colby Zaph

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Immunology and cell biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Frann AntignanoThe Biomedical Research Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Colby ZaphThe Biomedical Research Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000000298899848
Arthritis Research Centre of Canada · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CA

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research 128090Canadian Institutes of Health Research MOP-106623Canadian Institutes of Health Research MOP-89773
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Repressive epigenetic modifications such as dimethylation and trimethylation histone H3 at lysine 9 (H3K9me2 and H3K9me3) and H3K27me3 have been shown to be critical for embryonic stem (ES) cell differentiation by silencing cell lineage-promiscuous genes. CD4(+) T helper (T(H)) cell differentiation is a powerful model to study the molecular mechanisms associated with cellular lineage choice in adult cells. Naïve T(H) cells have the capacity to differentiate into one of the several phenotypically and functionally distinct and stable lineages. Although some repressive epigenetic mechanisms have a critical role in T(H) cell differentiation in a similar manner to that in ES cells, it is clear that there are disparate functions for certain modifications between ES cells and T(H) cells. Here we review the role of repressive histone modifications in the differentiation and function of T(H) cells in health and disease.

Indexed as

Cell DifferentiationEpigenetic RepressionAnimalsCD4 AntigensHistonesHumansInflammationMethylationT-Lymphocytes, Helper-InducerT-Lymphocyte SubsetsCD4 AntigensHistones

Identifiers

PMID25582341
OpenAlexW1974343294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.