Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25582120›Full record

ArticleThe EMBO journal2015

BRCA1 and CtIP promote alternative non-homologous end-joining at uncapped telomeres.

Sophie Badie, Ana Rita Carlos, Cecilia Folio, Keiji Okamoto, Peter Bouwman, Jos Jonkers, Madalena Tarsounas

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The EMBO journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Telomere Crisis Shapes Cancer Evolution.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. BRCA1 ensures genome integrity by eliminating estrogen-induced pathological topoisomerase II-DNA complexes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  9. Werner Syndrome Protein and DNA Replication.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Unsolved mystery: the role of BRCA1 in DNA end-joining.Journal of radiation research · 2016
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Sophie BadieTelomere and Genome Stability Group, The CR-UK/MRC Gray Institute for Radiation Oncology and Biology, Oxford, UK.
Ana Rita CarlosTelomere and Genome Stability Group, The CR-UK/MRC Gray Institute for Radiation Oncology and Biology, Oxford, UK.
Cecilia FolioTelomere and Genome Stability Group, The CR-UK/MRC Gray Institute for Radiation Oncology and Biology, Oxford, UK.
Keiji OkamotoDepartment of Molecular and Experimental Medicine, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Peter BouwmanDivision of Molecular Pathology and Cancer Systems Biology Centre, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jos JonkersDivision of Molecular Pathology and Cancer Systems Biology Centre, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Madalena TarsounasTelomere and Genome Stability Group, The CR-UK/MRC Gray Institute for Radiation Oncology and Biology, Oxford, UK madalena.tarsounas@oncology.ox.ac.uk.
CRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology · GBThe Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLScripps Research Institute · US

Funding

Cancer Research UK 17201
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Loss of telomere protection occurs during physiological cell senescence and ageing, due to attrition of telomeric repeats and insufficient retention of the telomere-binding factor TRF2. Subsequently formed telomere fusions trigger rampant genomic instability leading to cell death or tumorigenesis. Mechanistically, telomere fusions require either the classical non-homologous end-joining (C-NHEJ) pathway dependent on Ku70/80 and LIG4, or the alternative non-homologous end-joining (A-NHEJ), which relies on PARP1 and LIG3. Here, we show that the tumour suppressor BRCA1, together with its interacting partner CtIP, both acting in end resection, also promotes end-joining of uncapped telomeres. BRCA1 and CtIP do not function in the ATM-dependent telomere damage signalling, nor in telomere overhang removal, which are critical for telomere fusions by C-NHEJ. Instead, BRCA1 and CtIP act in the same pathway as LIG3 to promote joining of de-protected telomeres by A-NHEJ. Our work therefore ascribes novel roles for BRCA1 and CtIP in end-processing and fusion reactions at uncapped telomeres, underlining the complexity of DNA repair pathways that act at chromosome ends lacking protective structures. Moreover, A-NHEJ provides a mechanism of previously unanticipated significance in telomere dysfunction-induced genome instability.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntigens, NuclearAtaxia Telangiectasia Mutated ProteinsBRCA1 ProteinCarrier ProteinsCell Cycle ProteinsDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA DamageDNA End-Joining RepairDNA Ligase ATPDNA LigasesHEK293 CellsHumansKu AutoantigenMiceMice, KnockoutAntigens, NuclearAtaxia Telangiectasia Mutated ProteinsAtm protein, mouseBRCA1 ProteinCarrier ProteinsCell Cycle ProteinsDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA Ligase ATPDNA ligase III alpha protein, XenopusDNA LigasesKu AutoantigenLIG3 protein, humanLig3 protein, mouseLIG4 protein, humanParp1 protein, mousePoly-ADP-Ribose Binding ProteinsPoly (ADP-Ribose) Polymerase-1Poly(ADP-ribose) PolymerasesRBBP8 protein, mouseXenopus ProteinsXrcc6 protein, humanXrcc6 protein, mousealternative non‐homologous end‐joiningBRCA1/CtIPtelomereTRF2

Identifiers

PMID25582120
PMCPMC4339125
OpenAlexW2965660142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.