Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25582081›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Genetics2015

Methods of integrating data to uncover genotype-phenotype interactions.

Marylyn D Ritchie, Emily R Holzinger, Ruowang Li, Sarah A Pendergrass, Dokyoon Kim

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Genetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 509 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
509citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

509 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Target discovery and drug design in the era of artificial intelligence.Medicinal chemistry research : an international journal for rapid communications on design and mechanisms of action of biologically active agents · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

449 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Marylyn D RitchieDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Center for Systems Genomics, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA.
Emily R HolzingerNational Human Genome Research Institute, Inherited Disease Research Branch, Baltimore, Maryland 21224, USA.
Ruowang LiDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Center for Systems Genomics, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA.
Sarah A PendergrassDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Center for Systems Genomics, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA.
Dokyoon KimDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Center for Systems Genomics, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA.

Funding

PHARMACOGENOMICS OF ARRHYTHMIA THERAPYU01HL065962 · NHLBI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI RODEN, DAN M · 2001 to 2009
$24.8M
Pharmacogenomics of Arrhythmia TherapyU19HL065962 · NHLBI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI RODEN, DAN M · 2010 to 2014
$17.4M
Development of statistical genetics methodologyZIAHG000153 · NHGRI · NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI BAILEY-WILSON, JOAN ELLEN · 2009 to 2022
$5.0M
Analysis Tool for Heritable and Envirnonmental Network AssociationsR01LM010040 · NLM · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI RITCHIE, MARYLYN D · 2009 to 2010
$1.9M
NHLBI NIH HHS HL065962NLM NIH HHS LM010040
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent technological advances have expanded the breadth of available omic data, from whole-genome sequencing data, to extensive transcriptomic, methylomic and metabolomic data. A key goal of analyses of these data is the identification of effective models that predict phenotypic traits and outcomes, elucidating important biomarkers and generating important insights into the genetic underpinnings of the heritability of complex traits. There is still a need for powerful and advanced analysis strategies to fully harness the utility of these comprehensive high-throughput data, identifying true associations and reducing the number of false associations. In this Review, we explore the emerging approaches for data integration - including meta-dimensional and multi-staged analyses - which aim to deepen our understanding of the role of genetics and genomics in complex outcomes. With the use and further development of these approaches, an improved understanding of the relationship between genomic variation and human phenotypes may be revealed.

Indexed as

Data Interpretation, StatisticalGenetic VariationGenotypeModels, BiologicalPhenotypeHumansInheritance PatternsMeta-Analysis as TopicSystems Biology

Identifiers

PMID25582081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.