Editorial: Increased manuscript submissions prompt journals to make hard choices.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

1. ChatGPT and the Future of Journal Reviews: A Feasibility Study.The Yale journal of biology and medicine · 2023
   Review
2. Bibliometric Analysis of the Top 50 Most Cited Studies on Achilles Tendon Pathology.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2023
   Article
3. Example-Based Learning as a Guide for Revising a Peer-Reviewed Manuscript.Medical science educator · 2020
   Article
4. Editorial: Case Closed-Discontinuing Case Reports in Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research.Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2015
   Article
5. The case for open access.Arthroplasty today · 2015
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as