ArticleMolecular pharmaceutics2015
PET of follicle-stimulating hormone receptor: broad applicability to cancer imaging.
Article in Molecular pharmaceutics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Molecular targets and the emerging role of copper radionuclides in prostate cancer theranostics.EJNMMI research · 2025Review
- Radiolabeled LHRH and FSH Analogues as Cancer Theranostic Agents: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- A follicle-stimulating hormone receptor-targeted near-infrared fluorescent probe for tumor-selective imaging and photothermal therapy.Materials today. Bio · 2024Article
- Pilot Study: FSHR Expression in Neuroendocrine Tumors of the Appendix.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Pre-treatment circulating reproductive hormones levels predict pathological and survival outcomes in breast cancer submitted to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.International journal of clinical oncology · 2022Article
- ImmunoPET: Concept, Design, and Applications.Chemical reviews · 2020Review
- FSH Beyond Fertility.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2019Review
- Follicle-stimulating hormone peptide-conjugated nanoparticles for targeted shRNA delivery lead to effective gro-α silencing and antitumor activity against ovarian cancer.Drug delivery · 2018Article
- Antibody Selection for Cancer Target Validation of FSH-Receptor in Immunohistochemical Settings.Antibodies (Basel, Switzerland) · 2017Article
- Live imaging of follicle stimulating hormone receptors in gonads and bones using near infrared II fluorophore.Chemical science · 2017Article
- PET Imaging of FSHR Expression in Tumors withContrast media & molecular imaging · 2017Article
- Molecular Imaging of Cancer with Nanoparticle-Based Theranostic Probes.Contrast media & molecular imaging · 2017Review
- Antibody-based PET of uPA/uPAR signaling with broad applicability for cancer imaging.Oncotarget · 2016Article
- In vivo targeting of metastatic breast cancer via tumor vasculature-specific nano-graphene oxide.Biomaterials · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Selective overexpression of follicle-stimulating hormone receptor (FSHR) inside the vascular endothelium of tumors has been confirmed to play critical roles in angiogenesis, tumor invasion, and metastases. The expression level of FSHR correlates strongly with the response of tumors to antiangiogenic therapies. In this study, an immunoPET tracer was developed for imaging of FSHR in different cancer types. A monoclonal antibody (FSHR-mAb) against FSHR was conjugated with S-2-(4-isothiocyanatobenzyl)-1,4,7-triazacyclononane-1,4,7-triacetic acid (p-SCN-Bn-NOTA) and used for subsequent (64)Cu-labeling. NOTA-FSHR-mAb preserved FSHR specificity/affinity, confirmed by flow cytometry measurements. (64)Cu-labeling was successfully conducted with decent yields (∼25%) and high specific activity (0.93 GBq/mg). The uptake of (64)Cu-NOTA-FSHR-mAb was 3.6 ± 0.8, 13.2 ± 0.7, and 14.6 ± 0.4 %ID/g in FSHR-positive CAOV-3 tumors at 4, 24, and 48 h postinjection, respectively (n = 3), significantly higher (p < 0.05) than that in FSHR-negative SKOV-3 tumors (2.3 ± 1.2, 8.0 ± 0.9, and 9.1 ± 1.3 %ID/g at 4, 24, and 48 h postinjection, respectively (n = 3)) except at 4 h p.i. FSHR-relevant uptake of (64)Cu-NOTA-FSHR-mAb was also readily observed in other tumor types (e.g., triple-negative breast tumor MDA-MB-231 or prostate tumor PC-3). Histology studies showed universal FSHR expression in microvasculature of these four tumor types and also prominent expression in tumor cells of CAOV-3, PC-3, and MDA-MB-231. Correlations between tumor FSHR level and uptake of (64)Cu-NOTA-FSHR-mAb were witnessed in this study. FSHR-specific uptake of (64)Cu-NOTA-FSHR mAb in different tumors enables its applicability for future cancer theranostic applications and simultaneously establishes FSHR as a promising clinical target for cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.