Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25581441›Full record

ArticleMolecular pharmaceutics2015

PET of follicle-stimulating hormone receptor: broad applicability to cancer imaging.

Hao Hong, Yongjun Yan, Sixiang Shi, Stephen A Graves, Lazura K Krasteva, Robert J Nickles, Min Yang, Weibo Cai

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular pharmaceutics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. FSH Beyond Fertility.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2019
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. PET Imaging of FSHR Expression in Tumors withContrast media & molecular imaging · 2017
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hao HongDepartment of Radiology, ‡Department of Medical Physics, §Materials Science Program, and ∥Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison , Madison, Wisconsin 53705-2275, United States.
Yongjun Yan
Sixiang Shi
Stephen A Graves
Lazura K Krasteva
Robert J Nickles
Min Yang
Weibo Cai
University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center · US

Funding

UW COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTER SUPPORTP30CA014520 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Christian Capitini · 1985 to 2026
$142.6M
U.W. RADIOLOGICAL SCIENCES TRAINING PROGRAMT32CA009206 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Bryan Patrick Bednarz · 1985 to 2026
$12.1M
Novel Combination Therapy for Prostate CancerR01CA169365 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI CAI, WEIBO · 2013 to 2015
$903k
NCI NIH HHS 1R01CA169365NCI NIH HHS P30 CA014520NCI NIH HHS P30CA014520NCI NIH HHS R01 CA169365NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009206
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Selective overexpression of follicle-stimulating hormone receptor (FSHR) inside the vascular endothelium of tumors has been confirmed to play critical roles in angiogenesis, tumor invasion, and metastases. The expression level of FSHR correlates strongly with the response of tumors to antiangiogenic therapies. In this study, an immunoPET tracer was developed for imaging of FSHR in different cancer types. A monoclonal antibody (FSHR-mAb) against FSHR was conjugated with S-2-(4-isothiocyanatobenzyl)-1,4,7-triazacyclononane-1,4,7-triacetic acid (p-SCN-Bn-NOTA) and used for subsequent (64)Cu-labeling. NOTA-FSHR-mAb preserved FSHR specificity/affinity, confirmed by flow cytometry measurements. (64)Cu-labeling was successfully conducted with decent yields (∼25%) and high specific activity (0.93 GBq/mg). The uptake of (64)Cu-NOTA-FSHR-mAb was 3.6 ± 0.8, 13.2 ± 0.7, and 14.6 ± 0.4 %ID/g in FSHR-positive CAOV-3 tumors at 4, 24, and 48 h postinjection, respectively (n = 3), significantly higher (p < 0.05) than that in FSHR-negative SKOV-3 tumors (2.3 ± 1.2, 8.0 ± 0.9, and 9.1 ± 1.3 %ID/g at 4, 24, and 48 h postinjection, respectively (n = 3)) except at 4 h p.i. FSHR-relevant uptake of (64)Cu-NOTA-FSHR-mAb was also readily observed in other tumor types (e.g., triple-negative breast tumor MDA-MB-231 or prostate tumor PC-3). Histology studies showed universal FSHR expression in microvasculature of these four tumor types and also prominent expression in tumor cells of CAOV-3, PC-3, and MDA-MB-231. Correlations between tumor FSHR level and uptake of (64)Cu-NOTA-FSHR-mAb were witnessed in this study. FSHR-specific uptake of (64)Cu-NOTA-FSHR mAb in different tumors enables its applicability for future cancer theranostic applications and simultaneously establishes FSHR as a promising clinical target for cancer.

Indexed as

Positron-Emission TomographyAnimalsBreast NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorCopper RadioisotopesDiagnostic ImagingFemaleFlow CytometryHumansMaleMiceNeovascularization, PathologicOvarian NeoplasmsProstatic NeoplasmsReceptors, FSHCopper RadioisotopesReceptors, FSHangiogenesisCu-64follicle-stimulating hormone receptor (FSHR)immunoPETmolecular imagingpositron emission tomography (PET)

Identifiers

PMID25581441
PMCPMC4351720
OpenAlexW2316887276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.