Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25580914›Full record

ReviewWiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology

Ultrasound imaging beyond the vasculature with new generation contrast agents.

Reshani H Perera, Christopher Hernandez, Haoyan Zhou, Pavan Kota, Alan Burke, Agata A Exner

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Stimuli-Responsive Materials for Biomedical Applications.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. FN3 linked nanobubbles as a targeted contrast agent for US imaging of cancer-associated human PD-L1.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Reshani H PereraDepartment of Radiology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Christopher HernandezDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Haoyan ZhouDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Pavan KotaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Alan BurkeDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Agata A ExnerDepartment of Radiology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.

Funding

Sensitizer Delivery for Focused Hyperthermia Cancer TreatmentR01CA136857 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI EXNER, AGATA A · 2009 to 2013
$1.9M
Injectable Implants for Increased Tumor Treatment Volume Using Pressure Driven DiffusionF31CA200373 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI HERNANDEZ, CHRISTOPHER · 2015 to 2016
$66k
NCI NIH HHS F31 CA200373NCI NIH HHS R01 CA136857NCI NIH HHS R01CA136857
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current commercially available ultrasound contrast agents are gas-filled, lipid- or protein-stabilized microbubbles larger than 1 µm in diameter. Because the signal generated by these agents is highly dependent on their size, small yet highly echogenic particles have been historically difficult to produce. This has limited the molecular imaging applications of ultrasound to the blood pool. In the area of cancer imaging, microbubble applications have been constrained to imaging molecular signatures of tumor vasculature and drug delivery enabled by ultrasound-modulated bubble destruction. Recently, with the rise of sophisticated advancements in nanomedicine, ultrasound contrast agents, which are an order of magnitude smaller (100-500 nm) than their currently utilized counterparts, have been undergoing rapid development. These agents are poised to greatly expand the capabilities of ultrasound in the field of targeted cancer detection and therapy by taking advantage of the enhanced permeability and retention phenomenon of many tumors and can extravasate beyond the leaky tumor vasculature. Agent extravasation facilitates highly sensitive detection of cell surface or microenvironment biomarkers, which could advance early cancer detection. Likewise, when combined with appropriate therapeutic agents and ultrasound-mediated deployment on demand, directly at the tumor site, these nanoparticles have been shown to contribute to improved therapeutic outcomes. Ultrasound's safety profile, broad accessibility and relatively low cost make it an ideal modality for the changing face of healthcare today. Aided by the multifaceted nano-sized contrast agents and targeted theranostic moieties described herein, ultrasound can considerably broaden its reach in future applications focused on the diagnosis and staging of cancer.

Indexed as

Diagnostic ImagingAnimalsBlood VesselsContrast MediaHumansNanoparticlesNeoplasmsUltrasonicsContrast Media

Identifiers

PMID25580914
PMCPMC4478095

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.