Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25580254›Full record

ReviewF1000prime reports2014

Research priorities for the development and implementation of serological tools for malaria surveillance.

Salenna R Elliott, Freya J I Fowkes, Jack S Richards, Linda Reiling, Damien R Drew, James G Beeson

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in F1000prime reports, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2018
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Serological evidence of continued exposure toFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Serological surveillance on potentialFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. PvMSP8 as a NovelPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Salenna R ElliottBurnet Institute 85 Commercial Road, Melbourne, Victoria 3004 Australia.
Freya J I FowkesBurnet Institute 85 Commercial Road, Melbourne, Victoria 3004 Australia ; School of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University 99 Commercial Road, Victoria 3004 Australia ; School of Population Health and Department of Medicine (RMH), University of Melbourne Victoria 3010 Australia.
Jack S RichardsBurnet Institute 85 Commercial Road, Melbourne, Victoria 3004 Australia ; School of Population Health and Department of Medicine (RMH), University of Melbourne Victoria 3010 Australia ; Department of Microbiology, Monash University Victoria 3800 Australia.
Linda ReilingBurnet Institute 85 Commercial Road, Melbourne, Victoria 3004 Australia.
Damien R DrewBurnet Institute 85 Commercial Road, Melbourne, Victoria 3004 Australia.
James G BeesonBurnet Institute 85 Commercial Road, Melbourne, Victoria 3004 Australia ; School of Population Health and Department of Medicine (RMH), University of Melbourne Victoria 3010 Australia ; Department of Microbiology, Monash University Victoria 3800 Australia.
Burnet Institute · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Surveillance is a key component of control and elimination programs. Malaria surveillance has been typically reliant on case reporting by health services, entomological estimates and parasitemia (Plasmodium species) point prevalence. However, these techniques become less sensitive and relatively costly as transmission declines. There is great potential for the development and application of serological biomarkers of malaria exposure as sero-surveillance tools to strengthen malaria control and elimination. Antibodies to malaria antigens are sensitive biomarkers of population-level malaria exposure and can be used to identify hotspots of malaria transmission, estimate transmission levels, monitor changes over time or the impact of interventions on transmission, confirm malaria elimination, and monitor re-emergence of malaria. Sero-surveillance tools could be used in reference laboratories or developed as simple point-of-care tests for community-based surveillance, and different applications and target populations dictate the technical performance required from assays that are determined by properties of antigens and antibody responses. To advance the development of sero-surveillance tools for malaria elimination, major gaps in our knowledge need to be addressed through further research. These include greater knowledge of potential antigens, the sensitivity and specificity of antibody responses, and the longevity of these responses and defining antigens and antibodies that differentiate between exposure to Plasmodium falciparum and P. vivax. Additionally, a better understanding of the influence of host factors, such as age, genetics, and comorbidities on antibody responses in different populations is needed.

Identifiers

PMID25580254
PMCPMC4229730
OpenAlexW2102629874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.