Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25580205›Full record

ArticleFrontline gastroenterology2015

Utility of faecal calprotectin in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD): what cut-offs should we apply?

A Dhaliwal, Z Zeino, C Tomkins, M Cheung, C Nwokolo, S Smith, C Harmston, R P Arasaradnam

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontline gastroenterology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 100 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Evaluating the role of faecal calprotectin in older adults: a retrospective observational study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026
    Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Biomarkers in inflammatory bowel disease: a practical guide.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

A DhaliwalDepartment of Gastroenterology, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire, Coventry , UK.
Z ZeinoDepartment of Gastroenterology, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire, Coventry , UK.
C TomkinsDepartment of Biochemistry , University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire , Coventry , UK.
M CheungDepartment of Gastroenterology, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire, Coventry , UK.
C NwokoloDepartment of Gastroenterology, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire, Coventry , UK.
S SmithDepartment of Biochemistry , University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire , Coventry , UK.
C HarmstonDepartment of Colorectal Surgery , University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire, Coventry , UK.
R P ArasaradnamDepartment of Gastroenterology, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire, Coventry , UK ; Clinical Sciences Research Institute , Coventry , UK.
University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust · GBCoventry (United Kingdom) · GBCoventry University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFaecal calprotectin (FC), a cytosolic protein released by neutrophils (S100 family) in response to inflammation, is a simple, non-invasive test that can be used to differentiate irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), where there can be considerable symptom overlap. AIMS AND

methodsThe aims of the study were (1) to be able to predict the ability of FC to exclude IBD and determine cut-offs when in remission, (2) to investigate the effects of time and temperature on stability of FC and (3) compare three ELISA kits to measure FC: Buhlmann, PhiCal v1 and PhiCal v2. A total of 311 patients with altered bowel habit were tested for FC; 144 with IBS, 148 with IBD and 19 with other organic causes.

resultsSensitivity and specificity of FC (with PhiCal v2 kit) to distinguish between functional disorder (IBS) and IBD using cut-off 50 μg/g were 88% and 78%, respectively, with a negative predictive value of 87%. Area under the receiver operating curve was 0.84 (CI 0.78 to 0.90). For those with IBD, FC values below 250 μg/g corresponded with remission of disease with a sensitivity and specificity of 90% and 76%, respectively. Area under the receiver operating curve was 0.93 (CI 0.89 to 0.97). FC was stable once extracted and frozen for up to 2.5 months. Pearson correlation was good between Buhlmann assay and PhiCal v2 (r

conclusionsFC has up to 87% negative predictive value to exclude IBD, and cut-offs less than 250 μg/g had 90% sensitivity to determine remission in IBD. Once frozen, FC is stable and the ELISA monoclonal plates were broadly comparable.

Indexed as

IBDIrritable Bowel Syndrome

Identifiers

PMID25580205
PMCPMC4283700
OpenAlexW2155379545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.