Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25580038›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the Indian National Science Academy. Part B, Biological sciences2004

The Eye Specification Network in Drosophila.

Brandon P Weasner, Jason Anderson, Justin P Kumar

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the Indian National Science Academy. Part B, Biological sciences, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Brandon P WeasnerDepartment of Biology,Indiana University1001 E. 3rd StreetBloomington, IN 47401.
Jason AndersonDepartment of Biology,Indiana University1001 E. 3rd StreetBloomington, IN 47401.
Justin P KumarDepartment of Biology,Indiana University1001 E. 3rd StreetBloomington, IN 47401.
Indiana University Bloomington · US

Funding

Repression of Non-Ocular Fates by the SIX and EYA Genes During Specification and Patterning of the RetinaR01EY014863 · NEI · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI KUMAR, JUSTIN P · 2003 to 2017
$4.3M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY014863
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the most exciting revelations in retinal biology is the realization that the molecules and mechanisms that regulate eye development have been conserved in all seeing animals including such diverse organisms as the fruit fly, mouse and man. The emerging commonality among mechanisms used in eye development allows for the use of model systems such as the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster, to provide key insights into the development and diseases of the mammalian eye. Eye specification in Drosophila is controlled, in part, by the concerted activities of eight nuclear proteins and several signal transduction cascades that together form a tightly woven regulatory network. Loss of function mutations in several components lead to the complete derailment of eye development while ectopic expression of threse genes in non-retinal tissues can direct the fates of these tissues towards eye formation. Here we will describe what is currently known about this remarkable regulatory cassettee highlight some of the outstanding questions that still need to be answered.

Indexed as

Eye specificationFly eyeMaster regulatorsPatterning pathways function

Identifiers

PMID25580038
PMCPMC4286332
OpenAlexW2398932222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.