Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25579850›Full record

ArticleBiological psychiatry2015

Sex-specific neuroanatomical correlates of fear expression in prefrontal-amygdala circuits.

Tina M Gruene, Elian Roberts, Virginia Thomas, Ashley Ronzio, Rebecca M Shansky

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biological psychiatry, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 96 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
96citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

96 citing papers in PubMed, 153 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Sex Differences in Neural Circuits Underlying Fear Processing.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Small Differences and Big Changes: The Many Variables of MicroRNA Expression and Function in the Brain.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

36 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tina M GrueneDepartment of Psychology, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Elian RobertsDepartment of Psychology, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Virginia ThomasDepartment of Psychology, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Ashley RonzioDepartment of Psychology, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Rebecca M ShanskyDepartment of Psychology, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts. Electronic address: r.shansky@neu.edu.
Northeastern University · US

Funding

Sex Specific Neuroanatomical Markers Of Vulnerability In Animal Model Of PTSDR21MH098006 · NIMH · NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY · PI SHANSKY, REBECCA M · 2012 to 2013
$418k
NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH098006NIMH NIH HHS R21-MH098006-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe neural projections from the infralimbic region of the prefrontal cortex to the amygdala are important for the maintenance of conditioned fear extinction. Neurons in this pathway exhibit a unique pattern of structural plasticity that is sex-dependent, but the relationship between the morphologic characteristics of these neurons and successful extinction in male and female subjects is unknown.

methodsUsing classic cued fear conditioning and an extinction paradigm in large cohorts of male and female rats, we identified subpopulations of both sexes that exhibited high (HF) or low (LF) levels of freezing on an extinction retrieval test, representing failed or successful extinction maintenance, respectively. We combined retrograde tracing with fluorescent intracellular microinjections to perform three-dimensional reconstructions of infralimbic neurons that project to the basolateral amygdala in these groups.

resultsThe HF and LF male rats exhibited neuroanatomical distinctions that were not observed in HF or LF female rats. A retrospective analysis of behavior during fear conditioning and extinction revealed that despite no overall sex differences in freezing behavior, HF and LF phenotypes emerged in male rats during extinction and in female rats during fear conditioning, which does not involve infralimbic-basolateral amygdala neurons.

conclusionsOur results suggest that the neural processes underlying successful or failed extinction maintenance may be sex-specific. These findings are relevant not only to future basic research on sex differences in fear conditioning and extinction but also to exposure-based clinical therapies, which are similar in premise to fear extinction and which are primarily used to treat disorders that are more common in women than in men.

Indexed as

AmygdalaAnimalsExtinction, PsychologicalFearFemaleMaleNeuroanatomyNeuronsPrefrontal CortexRatsRats, Sprague-DawleySex CharacteristicsBasolateral AmygdalaDendritic MorphologyFear ExtinctionIndividual DifferencesInfralimbic CortexSex Differences

Identifiers

PMID25579850
PMCPMC4449316
OpenAlexW2007693017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.