Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25579805›Full record

ArticleDocumenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology2015

Rod and cone contributions to the dark-adapted 15-Hz flicker electroretinogram.

Jason C Park, Dingcai Cao, Frederick T Collison, Gerald A Fishman, J Jason McAnany

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Abnormal 8-Hz flicker electroretinograms in carriers of X-linked retinoschisis.Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology · 2016
    Article
  12. A method for estimating intrinsic noise in electroretinographic (ERG) signals.Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology · 2015
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jason C ParkDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, 1855 W. Taylor St., Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
Dingcai Cao
Frederick T Collison
Gerald A Fishman
J Jason McAnany

Funding

Translational Core for Therapeutic and Diagnostic DevelopmentP30EY001792 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI MCANANY, JAMES JASON · 1985 to 2025
$14.8M
Rod Cone Interactions in Mesopic VisionR01EY019651 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI CAO, DINGCAI · 2010 to 2013
$1.3M
Mechanisms limiting visual performance in retinal degenerationsR00EY019510 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI MCANANY, JAMES JASON · 2011 to 2013
$707k
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY001792NEI NIH HHS P30EY001792NEI NIH HHS R00 EY019510NEI NIH HHS R00EY019510NEI NIH HHS R01 EY019651NEI NIH HHS R01EY019651
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate rod and cone contributions to the dark-adapted 15-Hz flicker electroretinogram (ERG) across a broad range of stimulus luminances by comparing rod-isolating (ERGR), cone-isolating (ERGC), and non-receptor-specific (ERGR+C) responses.

methodsDark-adapted, full-field 15-Hz ERGs were obtained from four normally sighted subjects (ages 29-36 years) using a four-primary LED-based stimulating system. The primaries were either modulated sinusoidally in phase (ERGR+C) or were modulated in counter-phase to achieve rod isolation (ERGR) or cone isolation (ERGC) by means of triple silent substitution. Measurements were made for a broad range of luminances (-2.5 to 1.8 log scot. cd/m(2) in 0.2 log unit steps). Fourier analysis was used to obtain the amplitude and phase of the fundamental response component at each stimulus luminance.

resultsStimulus luminance had different effects on response amplitudes and phases under the three paradigms. Specifically, ERGC amplitude and phase increased monotonically as luminance increased. The effects on ERGR+C and ERGR were complex: ERGR+C and ERGR amplitude was small and the phase decreased for low luminances, whereas amplitude and phase increased sharply at moderate luminances. For high luminances, ERGR+C amplitude and phase increased, whereas ERGR amplitude decreased and phase was approximately constant.

conclusionsAt low luminances, the ERGR+C and ERGR functions can be attributed to interactions between two rod pathways. At high luminances, the functions can be accounted for by interactions between rod and cone pathways (ERGR+C) or rod insensitivity (ERGR). The ERGR paradigm minimizes cone intrusion, permitting assessment of rod function over a large range of luminance levels.

Indexed as

ElectroretinographyAdultDark AdaptationFemaleFourier AnalysisHealthy VolunteersHumansMalePhotic StimulationRetinal Cone Photoreceptor CellsRetinal Rod Photoreceptor Cells

Identifiers

PMID25579805
PMCPMC4355222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.